Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Tencent SkillHub ยท Other
Negotiation Mastery
Comprehensive negotiation system using proven frameworks for deal prep, live coaching, behavior analysis, objection handling, and post-deal review.
skill openclawclawhub Free
Comprehensive negotiation system using proven frameworks for deal prep, live coaching, behavior analysis, objection handling, and post-deal review.
โฌ 0 downloads โ
0 stars Unverified but indexed
Install for OpenClaw
Quick setup
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
- Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.
Package facts
- Download mode
- Yavira redirect
- Package format
- ZIP package
- Source platform
- Tencent SkillHub
- What's included
- README.md, SKILL.md
Validation
- Use the Yavira download entry.
- Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
- Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.
Install with your agent
Agent handoff
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
- Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
Upgrade existing
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Trust & source
Release facts
- Source
- Tencent SkillHub
- Verification
- Indexed source record
- Version
- 1.0.0
Provenance
- Publisher
- 1kalin
- Source page
- View original listing
- Canonical URL
- Open canonical page
Documentation
Negotiation Mastery
Complete negotiation system for business deals, salary talks, vendor contracts, partnerships, and high-stakes conversations. Combines multiple proven frameworks (FBI tactical empathy, Harvard principled negotiation, SPIN, anchoring science) into one actionable playbook.
When to Use This Skill
Preparing for any negotiation (salary, contract, deal, vendor, partnership) Live negotiation coaching (what to say next) Analyzing counterpart behavior and predicting moves Handling objections, deadlocks, and difficult conversations Post-negotiation review and lessons learned
1.1 Negotiation Brief
Fill this out BEFORE every negotiation: negotiation_brief: context: "[What is being negotiated]" counterpart: name: "[Person/company]" role: "[Their title and authority level]" company_size: "[Revenue/employees if known]" pressures: "[Deadlines, budget cycles, competing priorities]" personality_style: "" # analyst|accommodator|assertive|connector decision_authority: "" # final|recommender|gatekeeper|committee our_position: ideal_outcome: "[Best realistic result]" walkaway_point: "[Absolute minimum acceptable]" batna: "[Best Alternative To Negotiated Agreement โ what happens if no deal]" batna_strength: "" # strong|moderate|weak zopa_estimate: "[Zone of Possible Agreement โ overlap range]" time_pressure: "" # us|them|neutral leverage_sources: - "[What gives us power in this negotiation]" - "[Unique value only we provide]" - "[Their switching costs]" interests_map: our_interests: must_have: ["[Non-negotiable items]"] important: ["[Strong preference but flexible]"] nice_to_have: ["[Trading chips โ things we can give up]"] their_likely_interests: must_have: ["[What they can't live without]"] important: ["[Strong preferences]"] nice_to_have: ["[Things they might trade]"] black_swans: ["[Hidden info that could change everything]"] preparation_checklist: - accusation_audit_drafted: false - calibrated_questions_prepared: false - anchoring_strategy_chosen: false - concession_plan_mapped: false - walkaway_criteria_clear: false
1.2 Counterpart Style Assessment
Identify their negotiation style to adapt your approach: Analyst (40% of negotiators) Signs: Data-heavy emails, long pauses, asks for details, skeptical tone Approach: Send information in advance. Use silence. Provide evidence. Never rush them. Danger: They'll out-prepare you if you wing it. Key phrase: "I want to make sure we get this right." Assertive (25%) Signs: Fast pace, interrupts, states positions firmly, competitive language Approach: Let them talk first. Mirror their energy (not aggression). Use calibrated questions to redirect. Respect their time. Danger: They'll steamroll you if you're passive. Key phrase: "I hear how important this is to you." Accommodator (20%) Signs: Warm tone, relationship-focused, avoids conflict, says "yes" easily Approach: Build rapport first. Ask directly about concerns โ they won't volunteer negatives. Verify "yes" means real agreement (not just avoiding conflict). Danger: Their "yes" is often "maybe." Deals can unravel post-handshake. Key phrase: "I want to make sure this works for both of us โ what concerns do you have?" Connector (15%) Signs: Name-drops, references other deals, builds coalitions, values status Approach: Acknowledge their network. Frame deals as wins they can talk about. Reference social proof. Danger: They may be performing consensus they don't actually have. Key phrase: "This would be a great story for your team."
1.3 Power Analysis
Rate each factor 1-5 for both sides: Power SourceUsThemNotesAlternatives (BATNA strength)Better alternatives = more powerInformation (who knows more)Knowledge of their constraints/budgetTime (who's more urgent)Deadlines create pressureLegitimacy (standards/precedent)Market rates, industry normsRelationship (ongoing value)Long-term partnership leverageCommitment (sunk costs)How invested are they alreadySkill (negotiation experience)Experience at the table Total: Us [] vs Them [] If we're stronger: Anchor aggressively, push for value If balanced: Focus on creative trades, expand the pie If they're stronger: Improve BATNA before negotiating, use tactical empathy to equalize
2.1 The Accusation Audit
List every negative thought they might have about you or this deal. Say them FIRST: Template: "Before we start, I want to address some things you might be thinking. You might feel that [negative #1]. You're probably concerned that [negative #2]. And I wouldn't blame you if you thought [negative #3]. I want you to know that I understand these concerns, and here's how I'd like to address them..." Examples by context: Salary negotiation: "You might think I'm being ungrateful or greedy for bringing this up..." Vendor pricing: "You probably feel we're just trying to squeeze your margins..." Partnership: "You might worry we're too small to deliver on this..." Client scope change: "I know it probably seems like we're moving the goalposts..." Why it works: Naming fears diminishes them. Unspoken objections fester; spoken ones shrink.
2.2 Anchoring Strategy
When to anchor first (make the first offer): You have strong information about fair value You want to set the frame You're selling (anchor high) or buying something commoditized (anchor low) When to let them anchor first: You have less information than them You suspect their range might be higher than yours You want to discover their expectations Anchoring formulas: For SELLING (salary, services, products): Research market range (lowโhigh) Set your anchor at 15-30% above your target Justify with specific data points Never use round numbers ($127,500 not $130,000) For BUYING (vendors, contracts, acquisitions): Research market range Set anchor at 60-70% of their likely ask Justify with comparables Include non-monetary value in your counter
2.3 Frame Control
The person who sets the frame controls the negotiation. Common frames: FrameHow to Set ItExamplePartnership"How do we make this work for both of us?"Long-term dealsPrecedent"The standard rate for this is..."Rate negotiationsScarcity"We have capacity for 2 more clients this quarter"SalesLoss"Without this, the risk is..."UpsellingFairness"I want to make sure this is fair for everyone"Any negotiationExpert"In my experience with 50+ similar deals..."Credibility
3.1 Core Techniques Reference
Mirroring โ Repeat their last 1-3 words with rising inflection Purpose: Gets them to elaborate without asking a question Example: Them: "We just can't do that price." You: "...can't do that price?" Use 3-5 times per conversation. Overuse becomes obvious. Labeling โ Name their emotion with "It seems like..." / "It sounds like..." / "It looks like..." Purpose: Validates their experience, builds trust, surfaces hidden concerns Example: "It sounds like timeline is really what's driving this decision." Follow with silence. Let the label do its work. Never say "I understand" โ it's about THEM, not you. Calibrated Questions โ "How" and "What" questions that give them the illusion of control Purpose: Makes them solve YOUR problem Power questions: "How am I supposed to do that?" (gentle pushback on unreasonable asks) "What does success look like for you?" "How does this fit within your budget process?" "What's the biggest challenge you're facing with this?" "How would you like me to proceed?" "What happens if we don't reach an agreement?" "How can I make this work within your constraints?" "What would you need to see to move forward?" Tactical Silence โ Pause 4-7 seconds after making a point or asking a question Purpose: Creates discomfort that the other side fills (usually with concessions or information) Hardest technique to master. Practice counting silently to 5. Late-Night FM DJ Voice โ Slow, calm, downward-inflecting tone Purpose: Signals confidence and control. Calms heated moments. Use for: Delivering tough messages, anchoring, de-escalation Never use for: Building rapport (too cold), brainstorming (kills energy)
3.2 The "That's Right" Method
Most powerful two words in negotiation. Getting "That's right" means genuine buy-in (unlike "you're right" which is dismissive). Steps to trigger it: Listen actively to their full position Paraphrase their situation comprehensively Label the emotions behind their words Summarize: "So what you're saying is [their world, their constraints, their feelings]..." Wait for "That's right." Only propose solutions AFTER you get "That's right."
3.3 Saying "No" Without Saying No
Never say "No" directly. Use graduated responses: "How am I supposed to do that?" (gentlest โ makes them rethink) "I'd love to but I'm unable to do that." (firm but warm) "I'm sorry, that just doesn't work for us." (definitive) "I'm sorry, no." (nuclear โ use only when walking away)
3.4 Concession Strategy
The Ackerman Method (for price negotiations): Set target price First offer: 65% of target Second: 85% of target Third: 95% of target Final: 100% โ use precise number ($47,823 not $48,000) + add non-monetary item Concession rules: Never make the first concession on price (trade something else first) Every concession must get something in return ("If I can do X, would you be able to do Y?") Concessions should decrease in size (signals you're approaching your limit) Never concede on your own โ always tie it to their move Log every concession in real time: concession_log: - round: 1 we_gave: "[What we conceded]" we_got: "[What they conceded]" their_reaction: "[How they responded]" next_move: "[Our planned next step]"
3.5 Handling Deadlocks
When negotiations stall: Change the shape โ Add variables (timeline, scope, payment terms, exclusivity) Go to the balcony โ "Let me think about this and come back to you" (breaks emotional escalation) Use a hypothetical โ "What if we could [creative solution]? Would that change things?" Bring in a Black Swan โ Reveal new information strategically Change the people โ Suggest involving someone else ("Would it help to bring in [person]?") Re-anchor on interests โ "Let's step back. What are we both trying to achieve here?" Strategic walk-away โ "I don't think we can make this work. I appreciate your time." (Often gets a callback)
4.1 Salary Negotiation
Preparation: Research: Glassdoor, Levels.fyi, LinkedIn salary insights, industry reports Calculate your market value range (P25-P75) List 3-5 concrete achievements with $ impact Know your BATNA (other offers, current job value) Script: "I'm really excited about this role and want to make this work." (frame: partnership) "Based on my research and the value I bring, I was thinking in the range of $[anchor โ 15-20% above target]." If they counter low: "I appreciate that. Help me understand โ how did you arrive at that number?" "What I bring specifically is [achievement 1: saved $X], [achievement 2: grew Y by Z%], and [achievement 3]." If stuck: "Is salary the only lever, or can we look at [equity, bonus, title, remote days, signing bonus, review timeline]?" Never say: "I need $X because of my expenses/mortgage/etc." (irrelevant to them)
4.2 Vendor/Contract Negotiation
Preparation: Get 3+ competing quotes (real BATNA) Research their margins, competitors, and contract terms Identify their fiscal year-end (budget pressure) Script: "We really like your product and want to make this work." (genuine interest) "We've received competitive proposals at [lower number]. What can you do?" If they hold: "What would a 2-year commitment look like?" (trade commitment for discount) "Can we structure payment terms differently? [Quarterly vs annual, net-60 vs net-30]" Always negotiate: implementation fees, support tier, training, SLA, auto-renewal removal, price lock period
4.3 Client Deal Negotiation
Preparation: Quantify the value you deliver (ROI, time saved, revenue generated) Know their budget cycle and decision process Map all stakeholders and their interests Script: Lead with value: "Based on what you've shared, this should [save/generate] approximately $[X] annually." Present three-tier pricing (the middle one is your target โ decoy effect) If they push on price: "I want to make sure you get the outcome you need. If we reduce scope to [X], we could come in at [Y]. Would that work?" Never discount without removing scope. Ever. Price = value. "What would need to be true for you to move forward this week?"
4.4 Partnership/Equity Negotiation
Key principles: Everything is negotiable: vesting, cliffs, acceleration, roles, decision rights Get it in writing before anyone does work Negotiate control (voting, board seats) separately from economics (equity %) Topics to cover: Equity split and vesting schedule (standard: 4yr vest, 1yr cliff) Decision-making process (unanimous? majority? domain-specific?) What happens if someone leaves (buyback, drag-along, tag-along) Cash vs equity compensation for each partner IP assignment (everything created belongs to the company) Non-compete and non-solicit terms Exit scenarios (sale, IPO, dissolution)
5.1 Body Language Signals (In-Person/Video)
SignalLikely MeaningYour MoveLeaning forwardEngaged, interestedKeep going, make your askArms crossed + leaning backDefensive or skepticalLabel: "It seems like something about that doesn't sit right"Looking at watch/phoneLosing interest or time pressureSpeed up or offer a breakNodding slowlyProcessing, somewhat agreeingPause. Let them speak.Rapid noddingWants you to stop talkingStop. Ask: "What are your thoughts?"Steepled fingersFeeling confident/superiorThey think they have leverage. Probe: "What am I missing?"Touching face/neckDiscomfort or uncertaintyLabel the emotion. Slow down.Mirroring YOUR postureRapport establishedGood sign โ proceed to closing
5.2 Verbal Tells
They SayThey MeanYour Move"That's not in our budget""Not in THIS budget, but maybe another""What budget would this come from?""We need to think about it"Objection they won't voice"What specifically do you need to think through?""We're talking to others too"Leverage play (may be true)"Of course. What would make us the clear choice?""That's fair"Possible warning โ check if genuine"I want to make sure it actually IS fair. What concerns do you have?""My hands are tied"Someone else has authority"Who else would need to be involved to make this work?""We usually pay X"Anchoring with precedent"Help me understand โ what was the scope of that engagement?""Can you do better?"Lazy negotiating โ testing you"Better in what way? Help me understand what you need.""Final offer"Probably not final (especially first time)Stay calm. "I appreciate you being direct. Let me ask โ [calibrated question]"
5.3 Email/Async Negotiation Rules
Don't negotiate price over email if possible (call or meet) If you must: be brief, use precise numbers, end with a question Response timing matters: too fast = eager, too slow = disinterested. 4-24 hours is ideal. Never write anything you wouldn't want forwarded (assume it will be) Put your best offer in writing only when you're confident they'll accept
6.1 Closing Techniques
The Rule of Three โ Confirm agreement 3 times in 3 different ways: Direct: "So we're agreed on $X with Y terms?" Summary: "Let me make sure I have this right: [full summary]" Implementation: "Great. How should we handle the paperwork?" Implementation questions (most important step โ deals die in execution): "What does the approval process look like on your side?" "Who else needs to sign off?" "What timeline are we looking at for getting this finalized?" "What could prevent this from moving forward?"
6.2 Post-Negotiation Review
Fill this out after EVERY significant negotiation: negotiation_review: date: "[YYYY-MM-DD]" counterpart: "[Who]" context: "[What was negotiated]" outcome: result: "" # win|lose|partial|no-deal our_target: "[What we wanted]" actual_result: "[What we got]" satisfaction: "" # 1-10 relationship_impact: "" # strengthened|neutral|strained what_worked: - "[Technique or approach that was effective]" what_didnt: - "[Where we lost ground or made mistakes]" lessons: - "[Key takeaway for next time]" black_swans_discovered: - "[Hidden information that emerged]" follow_up_actions: - action: "[What needs to happen next]" owner: "[Who]" deadline: "[When]"
6.3 The 48-Hour Rule
Within 48 hours of reaching agreement: Send written summary of all terms (email) Confirm next steps and timeline Thank them genuinely (builds long-term relationship) Make first implementation move (momentum kills deal decay)
7.1 Multi-Party Negotiations
When more than 2 parties are involved: Map every stakeholder's interests SEPARATELY Build coalitions before the main negotiation Identify the "swing vote" โ who is undecided? Use bilateral pre-meetings to align positions In the room: address the most skeptical person's concerns first
7.2 Cross-Cultural Considerations
Culture TypeApproachWatch ForDirect (US, Germany, Israel, Netherlands)State positions clearly, expect pushbackDon't mistake bluntness for hostilityIndirect (Japan, Korea, Thailand, much of LATAM)Read between lines, proposals in writing, patience"Yes" may mean "I heard you" not "I agree"Relationship-first (Middle East, China, parts of Africa)Invest in dinners, trust-building, long timelinesRushing to terms = insultContract-first (US, UK, Australia)Get to specifics quickly, lawyers earlyOver-reliance on paper; trust matters too
7.3 Negotiating Under Pressure
When you're in a weak position: Improve your BATNA first โ Don't negotiate until you have alternatives Slow everything down โ Pressure thrives on speed Ask more questions โ Information is power Unbundle the deal โ Negotiate each element separately Introduce new variables โ More items = more trading opportunities Use objective criteria โ Market data, benchmarks, industry standards Strategic vulnerability โ "I'll be honest, we need this to work. Here's why it's worth making it work for you too."
7.4 Negotiating with Difficult People
The Bully โ Aggressive, intimidating, threatens Stay calm. Mirror their words (not energy). "It seems like you feel strongly about this." Never match aggression. Silence is your weapon. "I want to find a solution. Help me understand what you need." The Ghost โ Stops responding, avoids commitment "Have you given up on this project?" (triggers "No" response) Set deadlines: "I can hold this offer until [date]. After that, my availability changes." Go around: find another contact at their organization. The Nibbler โ Agrees, then asks for "one more thing" repeatedly "I'm happy to discuss that. What would you be willing to adjust from what we've already agreed?" Every nibble gets a counter-nibble. The Authority Excuse โ "I need to check with my boss" Ask upfront: "Who else is involved in this decision?" "When you check with them, what do you think they'll focus on?" Offer to present to the decision-maker directly.
Quick-Reference: Negotiation Scoring Rubric
Score your preparation and performance (0-100): DimensionWeightScore (0-10)Preparation (research, BATNA, interests mapped)25%Opening (frame, anchor, accusation audit)15%Information gathering (questions, listening, discovery)20%Value creation (expanded pie, creative trades)15%Tactical execution (techniques, concession management)15%Closing (commitment, implementation, follow-up)10% Weighted total: [__] / 100 80+: Expert negotiation 60-79: Solid performance 40-59: Adequate โ review what was missed Below 40: Significant preparation or technique gaps
Common Mistakes (Avoid These)
Negotiating against yourself โ Making concessions before they even push back Splitting the difference โ Lazy compromise leaves value on the table Accepting the first offer โ There's ALWAYS room to negotiate Negotiating only on price โ Scope, timeline, terms, support, payment structure are all levers Talking too much โ The more you talk, the more you reveal. Listen 70%, talk 30%. Taking it personally โ It's business. Separate the people from the problem. No BATNA โ Negotiating without alternatives = negotiating from weakness Winging it โ The best negotiators prepare more, not less Ignoring implementation โ A deal on paper means nothing if execution isn't planned Burning bridges โ Today's opponent is tomorrow's partner. Always leave gracefully.
Category context
Long-tail utilities that do not fit the current primary taxonomy cleanly.
Source: Tencent SkillHub
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.
Package contents
Included in package
2 Docs
- SKILL.md
- README.md