{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "item": {
    "slug": "afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "name": "Vendor Evaluation & Due Diligence",
    "source": "tencent",
    "type": "skill",
    "category": "效率提升",
    "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/1kalin/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "canonicalUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/1kalin/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw"
  },
  "install": {
    "downloadMode": "redirect",
    "downloadUrl": "/downloads/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "sourceDownloadUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "sourcePlatform": "tencent",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw",
    "installMethod": "Manual import",
    "extraction": "Extract archive",
    "prerequisites": [
      "OpenClaw"
    ],
    "packageFormat": "ZIP package",
    "includedAssets": [
      "README.md",
      "SKILL.md"
    ],
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "quickSetup": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.",
      "Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup."
    ],
    "agentAssist": {
      "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
      "steps": [
        "Download the package from Yavira.",
        "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
        "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
      ],
      "prompts": [
        {
          "label": "New install",
          "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
        },
        {
          "label": "Upgrade existing",
          "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
        }
      ]
    },
    "sourceHealth": {
      "source": "tencent",
      "status": "healthy",
      "reason": "direct_download_ok",
      "recommendedAction": "download",
      "checkedAt": "2026-04-30T16:55:25.780Z",
      "expiresAt": "2026-05-07T16:55:25.780Z",
      "httpStatus": 200,
      "finalUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=network",
      "contentType": "application/zip",
      "probeMethod": "head",
      "details": {
        "probeUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=network",
        "contentDisposition": "attachment; filename=\"network-1.0.0.zip\"",
        "redirectLocation": null,
        "bodySnippet": null
      },
      "scope": "source",
      "summary": "Source download looks usable.",
      "detail": "Yavira can redirect you to the upstream package for this source.",
      "primaryActionLabel": "Download for OpenClaw",
      "primaryActionHref": "/downloads/afrexai-vendor-eval"
    },
    "validation": {
      "installChecklist": [
        "Use the Yavira download entry.",
        "Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.",
        "Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets."
      ],
      "postInstallChecks": [
        "Confirm the extracted package includes the expected docs or setup files.",
        "Validate the skill or prompts are available in your target agent workspace.",
        "Capture any manual follow-up steps the agent could not complete."
      ]
    },
    "downloadPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "agentPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/afrexai-vendor-eval/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/afrexai-vendor-eval/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/afrexai-vendor-eval/agent.md"
  },
  "agentAssist": {
    "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
    "steps": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
      "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
    ],
    "prompts": [
      {
        "label": "New install",
        "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
      },
      {
        "label": "Upgrade existing",
        "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
      }
    ]
  },
  "documentation": {
    "source": "clawhub",
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "Vendor Evaluation & Due Diligence",
        "body": "Structured framework for evaluating software vendors, service providers, and technology partners before signing contracts."
      },
      {
        "title": "What This Does",
        "body": "Runs a systematic vendor assessment across 8 dimensions:\n\nFinancial Stability — Revenue signals, funding, burn rate indicators\nTechnical Fit — Architecture compatibility, integration complexity, API quality\nSecurity & Compliance — SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, data residency\nPricing Analysis — TCO modeling, hidden costs, contract traps\nReference Check — Customer sentiment, G2/Capterra scores, churn signals\nSupport Quality — SLA terms, response times, escalation paths\nVendor Lock-in Risk — Data portability, switching costs, proprietary dependencies\nRoadmap Alignment — Product direction vs. your needs over 12-36 months"
      },
      {
        "title": "How to Use",
        "body": "Tell your agent:\n\n\"Evaluate [vendor] for [use case]\"\n\"Compare [vendor A] vs [vendor B] for our [need]\"\n\"Run due diligence on [company] before we sign\"\n\nThe agent will research the vendor using web search and produce a scored evaluation report with a GO / CAUTION / NO-GO recommendation."
      },
      {
        "title": "Scoring",
        "body": "Each dimension scores 1-10. Overall score is weighted:\n\nTechnical Fit & Security: 2x weight\nPricing & Lock-in: 1.5x weight\nAll others: 1x weight\n\nThresholds:\n\n75+ = GO (proceed with negotiation)\n50-74 = CAUTION (address gaps before committing)\nBelow 50 = NO-GO (find alternatives)"
      },
      {
        "title": "Output Format",
        "body": "## Vendor Evaluation: [Name]\n**Use Case:** [What you're buying]\n**Date:** [Assessment date]\n**Overall Score:** [X/100] — [GO/CAUTION/NO-GO]\n\n### Dimension Scores\n| Dimension | Score | Key Finding |\n|-----------|-------|-------------|\n| Financial Stability | X/10 | ... |\n| Technical Fit | X/10 | ... |\n| ... | ... | ... |\n\n### Critical Risks\n- [List dealbreakers or major concerns]\n\n### Negotiation Leverage\n- [Points to push on in contract talks]\n\n### Recommendation\n[Final verdict with reasoning]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Instructions for Agent",
        "body": "When asked to evaluate a vendor:\n\nSearch the web for: \"[vendor] reviews\", \"[vendor] pricing\", \"[vendor] SOC2\", \"[vendor] alternatives\", \"[vendor] G2 reviews\"\nCheck for recent funding/layoff news\nLook at their API documentation quality\nFind contract terms and SLA information\nScore each dimension with evidence\nProduce the evaluation report\nFlag any dealbreakers prominently\n\nBe direct. Companies hide bad news — dig for it. A vendor that looks perfect probably isn't. Find the tradeoffs.\n\nFor comparative evaluations, use the same framework side-by-side with a clear winner per dimension."
      }
    ],
    "body": "Vendor Evaluation & Due Diligence\n\nStructured framework for evaluating software vendors, service providers, and technology partners before signing contracts.\n\nWhat This Does\n\nRuns a systematic vendor assessment across 8 dimensions:\n\nFinancial Stability — Revenue signals, funding, burn rate indicators\nTechnical Fit — Architecture compatibility, integration complexity, API quality\nSecurity & Compliance — SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, data residency\nPricing Analysis — TCO modeling, hidden costs, contract traps\nReference Check — Customer sentiment, G2/Capterra scores, churn signals\nSupport Quality — SLA terms, response times, escalation paths\nVendor Lock-in Risk — Data portability, switching costs, proprietary dependencies\nRoadmap Alignment — Product direction vs. your needs over 12-36 months\nHow to Use\n\nTell your agent:\n\n\"Evaluate [vendor] for [use case]\"\n\"Compare [vendor A] vs [vendor B] for our [need]\"\n\"Run due diligence on [company] before we sign\"\n\nThe agent will research the vendor using web search and produce a scored evaluation report with a GO / CAUTION / NO-GO recommendation.\n\nScoring\n\nEach dimension scores 1-10. Overall score is weighted:\n\nTechnical Fit & Security: 2x weight\nPricing & Lock-in: 1.5x weight\nAll others: 1x weight\n\nThresholds:\n\n75+ = GO (proceed with negotiation)\n50-74 = CAUTION (address gaps before committing)\nBelow 50 = NO-GO (find alternatives)\nOutput Format\n## Vendor Evaluation: [Name]\n**Use Case:** [What you're buying]\n**Date:** [Assessment date]\n**Overall Score:** [X/100] — [GO/CAUTION/NO-GO]\n\n### Dimension Scores\n| Dimension | Score | Key Finding |\n|-----------|-------|-------------|\n| Financial Stability | X/10 | ... |\n| Technical Fit | X/10 | ... |\n| ... | ... | ... |\n\n### Critical Risks\n- [List dealbreakers or major concerns]\n\n### Negotiation Leverage\n- [Points to push on in contract talks]\n\n### Recommendation\n[Final verdict with reasoning]\n\nInstructions for Agent\n\nWhen asked to evaluate a vendor:\n\nSearch the web for: \"[vendor] reviews\", \"[vendor] pricing\", \"[vendor] SOC2\", \"[vendor] alternatives\", \"[vendor] G2 reviews\"\nCheck for recent funding/layoff news\nLook at their API documentation quality\nFind contract terms and SLA information\nScore each dimension with evidence\nProduce the evaluation report\nFlag any dealbreakers prominently\n\nBe direct. Companies hide bad news — dig for it. A vendor that looks perfect probably isn't. Find the tradeoffs.\n\nFor comparative evaluations, use the same framework side-by-side with a clear winner per dimension."
  },
  "trust": {
    "sourceLabel": "tencent",
    "provenanceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/1kalin/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "publisherUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/1kalin/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "owner": "1kalin",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "license": null,
    "verificationStatus": "Indexed source record"
  },
  "links": {
    "detailUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "downloadUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/afrexai-vendor-eval",
    "agentUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/afrexai-vendor-eval/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/afrexai-vendor-eval/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/afrexai-vendor-eval/agent.md"
  }
}