Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Get an independent risk assessment for any proposed Uniswap operation — swap, LP position, bridge, or token interaction. Evaluates slippage, impermanent loss, liquidity, smart contract, and bridge risks with a clear APPROVE or VETO decision. Use when the user asks if something is safe or wants a risk evaluation.
Get an independent risk assessment for any proposed Uniswap operation — swap, LP position, bridge, or token interaction. Evaluates slippage, impermanent loss, liquidity, smart contract, and bridge risks with a clear APPROVE or VETO decision. Use when the user asks if something is safe or wants a risk evaluation.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Provides an independent, multi-dimensional risk assessment for any proposed Uniswap operation. Delegates to the risk-assessor agent, which evaluates risk across 5+ dimensions and produces a composite score with a clear APPROVE, CONDITIONAL_APPROVE, VETO, or HARD_VETO decision. The risk-assessor is a terminal node — it cannot be influenced by other agents. Its assessment is independent and objective, based solely on on-chain data.
Activate when the user asks: "Is this trade safe?" "Risk assessment for swapping 100 ETH for USDC" "Should I LP in this pool?" "Evaluate the risk of swapping X for Y" "How risky is this pool?" "Is it safe to bridge tokens to Base?" "What's the risk of LPing with this token?" "Check if this token is safe to trade" "Risk check before I swap"
ParameterRequiredDefaultHow to ExtractoperationYes—Natural language description of what the user wants to doriskToleranceNomoderate"conservative", "moderate", "aggressive" The operation parameter is flexible — it can be: A swap: "swap 100 ETH for USDC on Ethereum" An LP action: "add $50K liquidity to WETH/USDC V3 0.05%" A bridge: "bridge 10 ETH from Ethereum to Base" A token check: "is PEPE safe to trade?" A pool check: "is the UNI/WETH pool risky?"
Parse the operation from the user's request. Identify: Operation type: swap, add liquidity, remove liquidity, bridge, or token check Tokens involved Amounts Chain(s) Pool (if applicable) Delegate to risk-assessor: Invoke Task(subagent_type:risk-assessor) with the parsed operation details and risk tolerance. The agent evaluates: DimensionWhat It ChecksSlippagePrice impact for the trade size vs pool liquidityImpermanent LossExpected IL based on pair volatility (LP operations only)LiquidityCan the position be exited? TVL vs position size ratioSmart ContractPool age, Uniswap version, hook audit status (V4)BridgeBridge mechanism reliability, liquidity (cross-chain only) Present the assessment clearly with per-dimension scores and a final decision.
Risk Assessment Operation: Swap 100 ETH for USDC on Ethereum Risk Tolerance: Moderate Decision: APPROVE Risk Dimensions: Slippage: LOW (0.3% price impact — sufficient liquidity) Liquidity: LOW (TVL 250x trade size — deep pool) Smart Contract: LOW (V3 pool, 18 months old, battle-tested) Bridge: N/A (not a cross-chain operation) Composite Risk: LOW Conditions: None — safe to proceed HARD VETO Checks: ✓ Verified tokens ✓ Pool TVL > $1,000 ✓ Price impact < 10%
Risk Assessment Operation: LP $50K into NEWTOKEN/WETH 0.3% V4 (Ethereum) Risk Tolerance: Conservative Decision: VETO Risk Dimensions: Slippage: MEDIUM (1.2% entry impact due to low liquidity) Impermanent Loss: HIGH (>25% annual estimate — extremely volatile pair) Liquidity: HIGH (TVL only 8x position size — exit risk) Smart Contract: HIGH (V4 pool with unaudited hook contract) Bridge: N/A Composite Risk: HIGH (exceeds conservative tolerance) Why VETO: - Impermanent loss estimate exceeds 20% annually - V4 hook contract is unaudited — elevated smart contract risk - Position would represent 12% of pool TVL — concentration risk Mitigations (if you still want to proceed): - Reduce position size to < 1% of pool TVL ($4,200) - Use a wider range to reduce IL exposure - Wait for hook contract audit - Switch to risk tolerance "aggressive" (not recommended)
Risk Assessment Operation: Swap 1000 ETH for SCAMTOKEN Decision: HARD VETO (non-overridable) HARD VETO Trigger: Unverified token contract SCAMTOKEN (0x1234...5678) failed verification: - Not on any verified token list - Contract deployed < 24 hours ago - No trading history This operation CANNOT proceed regardless of risk tolerance. Hard vetoes protect against potential rug pulls and scam tokens. Suggestion: Use "research-token SCAMTOKEN" to investigate further.
The risk-assessor is a terminal, independent node. Its assessment cannot be overridden by other agents. HARD VETO decisions are non-negotiable — they trigger for: unverified tokens, pool TVL < $1K, price impact > 10%, bridge amount exceeding bridge liquidity. This skill assesses risk but does not execute any operations. It's a "should I?" check before acting. For LP operations, IL risk is always evaluated alongside the other dimensions. When data is insufficient, the risk-assessor defaults to HIGH risk for the affected dimension rather than guessing.
ErrorUser-Facing MessageSuggested ActionCannot parse operation"I need more details. What exactly are you planning?"Ask user to describe the operationToken not found"Could not find token X."Provide contract addressPool data unavailable"Cannot access pool data for risk analysis."Try again laterAgent unavailable"Risk assessor is not available."Check agent configuration
Identity, auth, scanning, governance, audit, and operational guardrails.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.