Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Track competitors with pricing alerts, feature changes, positioning analysis, and strategic dossiers.
Track competitors with pricing alerts, feature changes, positioning analysis, and strategic dossiers.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
On first use, read setup.md for integration guidelines.
User needs competitive intelligence. Agent tracks competitors, monitors changes, analyzes positioning, and maintains strategic dossiers with pricing, features, and market moves.
Memory lives in ~/competitor-monitoring/. See memory-template.md for structure. ~/competitor-monitoring/ โโโ memory.md # Status + preferences + active competitors โโโ competitors/ # Individual dossiers โ โโโ {company}.md # Per-competitor intelligence โ โโโ ... โโโ alerts/ # Triggered alerts โ โโโ YYYY-MM-DD.md # Daily alert log โโโ analysis/ # Strategic analyses โโโ {topic}.md # Comparison reports
TopicFileSetup processsetup.mdMemory templatememory-template.md
Before any competitor question, load the relevant competitors/{company}.md file. Build on existing intelligence, don't start fresh each time.
SignalWhere to LookImpactPricing changesPricing page, announcementsDirect competitive threatNew featuresChangelog, blog, socialCapability gap/parityPositioning shiftsHomepage copy, adsMarket narrativeHiring patternsJobs page, LinkedInStrategic directionFunding/acquisitionsNews, CrunchbaseResource changes
Critical: Pricing undercut, feature that blocks your advantage High: Major feature launch, positioning change Medium: Blog posts, minor updates, team changes Low: Social activity, routine content
Don't report everything. Only surface changes that require action or awareness. If nothing actionable happened, say so.
After any research or mention of a competitor, update their dossier. Don't wait for explicit instructions.
Every observation should connect to "so what?" What does this mean for user's positioning, roadmap, or priorities? Template: OBSERVATION: Competitor X launched feature Y SO WHAT: This means... โ For our roadmap: [accelerate/deprioritize/ignore] โ For positioning: [adjust messaging/double down/no change] โ For sales: [new objection/new advantage/neutral]
Weekly: Scan pricing pages, homepages, changelogs Monthly: Deep dive on positioning, feature comparison Quarterly: Full competitive landscape review
User mentions competitor โ refresh dossier Industry news โ check all relevant competitors User launches feature โ compare to competitor alternatives
Each competitors/{company}.md contains: Company overview (what they do, target market) Pricing (current, historical changes) Features (core, recent additions) Positioning (messaging, differentiation) Strengths (honest assessment) Weaknesses (opportunities to exploit) Recent moves (last 90 days) Watch list (what to monitor)
Map all competitors by segment. Who's premium, who's cheap, who's niche. Market Map (example): โโโ Premium ($500+/mo): BigCorp, EnterpriseCo โโโ Mid-market ($100-500): CompetitorA, CompetitorB โโโ SMB ($20-100): Us, StartupX โโโ Free/Freemium: OpenSourceY โ Gap: No one owns "professional but affordable"
How is the competitive space evolving? What's the direction? Watch for: New entrants, funding rounds, pivots, acquisitions Pattern recognition: Are competitors moving upmarket? Going vertical?
Where are opportunities nobody's addressing? Underserved segments Features everyone complains about but nobody fixes Adjacent markets competitors ignore
Vanity metrics obsession โ Tracking social followers instead of pricing/features. Social numbers don't predict competitive moves. Confirmation bias โ Ignoring competitor strengths because you don't want to see them. Honest assessment beats false confidence. Information overload โ Reporting every blog post and tweet. Filter for actionable signals, not noise. Stale dossiers โ Intelligence from 6 months ago is worse than no intelligence. Update after every mention. Missing indirect competitors โ Watching direct rivals but ignoring substitutes. Spreadsheets compete with project management tools. Reactive only โ Only checking competitors when something breaks. Proactive monitoring catches threats early. Single source โ Only watching their website. Combine: pricing page, changelog, blog, jobs, social, reviews.
Data that stays local: All competitor dossiers stored in ~/competitor-monitoring/ Analysis reports and alert history User preferences and monitoring settings What happens on first use: Creates folder ~/competitor-monitoring/ with your data Asks how you want monitoring to work (proactive vs on-demand) This skill does NOT: Access competitor internal systems Scrape data in violation of ToS Store credentials or sensitive tokens Send your data externally
Install with clawhub install <slug> if user confirms: market-research โ broader market analysis business โ strategic frameworks analytics โ data analysis patterns
If useful: clawhub star competitor-monitoring Stay updated: clawhub sync
Data access, storage, extraction, analysis, reporting, and insight generation.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.