{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "item": {
    "slug": "content-quality-auditor",
    "name": "Content Quality Auditor",
    "source": "tencent",
    "type": "skill",
    "category": "数据分析",
    "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/content-quality-auditor",
    "canonicalUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/content-quality-auditor",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw"
  },
  "install": {
    "downloadMode": "redirect",
    "downloadUrl": "/downloads/content-quality-auditor",
    "sourceDownloadUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=content-quality-auditor",
    "sourcePlatform": "tencent",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw",
    "installMethod": "Manual import",
    "extraction": "Extract archive",
    "prerequisites": [
      "OpenClaw"
    ],
    "packageFormat": "ZIP package",
    "includedAssets": [
      "SKILL.md",
      "references/item-reference.md"
    ],
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "quickSetup": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.",
      "Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup."
    ],
    "agentAssist": {
      "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
      "steps": [
        "Download the package from Yavira.",
        "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
        "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
      ],
      "prompts": [
        {
          "label": "New install",
          "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
        },
        {
          "label": "Upgrade existing",
          "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
        }
      ]
    },
    "sourceHealth": {
      "source": "tencent",
      "status": "healthy",
      "reason": "direct_download_ok",
      "recommendedAction": "download",
      "checkedAt": "2026-04-23T16:43:11.935Z",
      "expiresAt": "2026-04-30T16:43:11.935Z",
      "httpStatus": 200,
      "finalUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=4claw-imageboard",
      "contentType": "application/zip",
      "probeMethod": "head",
      "details": {
        "probeUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=4claw-imageboard",
        "contentDisposition": "attachment; filename=\"4claw-imageboard-1.0.1.zip\"",
        "redirectLocation": null,
        "bodySnippet": null
      },
      "scope": "source",
      "summary": "Source download looks usable.",
      "detail": "Yavira can redirect you to the upstream package for this source.",
      "primaryActionLabel": "Download for OpenClaw",
      "primaryActionHref": "/downloads/content-quality-auditor"
    },
    "validation": {
      "installChecklist": [
        "Use the Yavira download entry.",
        "Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.",
        "Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets."
      ],
      "postInstallChecks": [
        "Confirm the extracted package includes the expected docs or setup files.",
        "Validate the skill or prompts are available in your target agent workspace.",
        "Capture any manual follow-up steps the agent could not complete."
      ]
    },
    "downloadPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/content-quality-auditor",
    "agentPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/content-quality-auditor/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/content-quality-auditor/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/content-quality-auditor/agent.md"
  },
  "agentAssist": {
    "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
    "steps": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
      "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
    ],
    "prompts": [
      {
        "label": "New install",
        "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
      },
      {
        "label": "Upgrade existing",
        "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
      }
    ]
  },
  "documentation": {
    "source": "clawhub",
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "Content Quality Auditor",
        "body": "Based on CORE-EEAT Content Benchmark. Full benchmark reference: references/core-eeat-benchmark.md\n\nSEO & GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · Install all: npx skills add aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills\n\nResearch · keyword-research · competitor-analysis · serp-analysis · content-gap-analysis\n\nBuild · seo-content-writer · geo-content-optimizer · meta-tags-optimizer · schema-markup-generator\n\nOptimize · on-page-seo-auditor · technical-seo-checker · internal-linking-optimizer · content-refresher\n\nMonitor · rank-tracker · backlink-analyzer · performance-reporter · alert-manager\n\nCross-cutting · content-quality-auditor · domain-authority-auditor · entity-optimizer · memory-management\n\nThis skill evaluates content quality across 80 standardized criteria organized in 8 dimensions. It produces a comprehensive audit report with per-item scoring, dimension and system scores, weighted totals by content type, and a prioritized action plan."
      },
      {
        "title": "When to Use This Skill",
        "body": "Auditing content quality before publishing\nEvaluating existing content for improvement opportunities\nBenchmarking content against CORE-EEAT standards\nComparing content quality against competitors\nAssessing both GEO readiness (AI citation potential) and SEO strength (source credibility)\nRunning periodic content quality checks as part of a content maintenance program\nAfter writing or optimizing content with seo-content-writer or geo-content-optimizer"
      },
      {
        "title": "What This Skill Does",
        "body": "Full 80-Item Audit: Scores every CORE-EEAT check item as Pass/Partial/Fail\nDimension Scoring: Calculates scores for all 8 dimensions (0-100 each)\nSystem Scoring: Computes GEO Score (CORE) and SEO Score (EEAT)\nWeighted Totals: Applies content-type-specific weights for final score\nVeto Detection: Flags critical trust violations (T04, C01, R10)\nPriority Ranking: Identifies Top 5 improvements sorted by impact\nAction Plan: Generates specific, actionable improvement steps"
      },
      {
        "title": "Audit Content",
        "body": "Audit this content against CORE-EEAT: [content text or URL]\n\nRun a content quality audit on [URL] as a [content type]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Audit with Content Type",
        "body": "CORE-EEAT audit for this product review: [content]\n\nScore this how-to guide against the 80-item benchmark: [content]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Comparative Audit",
        "body": "Audit my content vs competitor: [your content] vs [competitor content]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Data Sources",
        "body": "See CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.\n\nWith ~~web crawler + ~~SEO tool connected:\nAutomatically fetch page content, extract HTML structure, check schema markup, verify internal/external links, and pull competitor content for comparison.\n\nWith manual data only:\nAsk the user to provide:\n\nContent text, URL, or file path\nContent type (if not auto-detectable): Product Review, How-to Guide, Comparison, Landing Page, Blog Post, FAQ Page, Alternative, Best-of, or Testimonial\nOptional: competitor content for benchmarking\n\nProceed with the full 80-item audit using provided data. Note in the output which items could not be fully evaluated due to missing access (e.g., backlink data, schema markup, site-level signals)."
      },
      {
        "title": "Instructions",
        "body": "When a user requests a content quality audit:"
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 1: Preparation",
        "body": "### Audit Setup\n\n**Content**: [title or URL]\n**Content Type**: [auto-detected or user-specified]\n**Dimension Weights**: [loaded from content-type weight table]\n\n#### Veto Check (Emergency Brake)\n\n| Veto Item | Status | Action |\n|-----------|--------|--------|\n| T04: Disclosure Statements | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Add disclosure banner at page top immediately\"] |\n| C01: Intent Alignment | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Rewrite title and first paragraph\"] |\n| R10: Content Consistency | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Verify all data before publishing\"] |\n\nIf any veto item triggers, flag it prominently at the top of the report and recommend immediate action before continuing the full audit."
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 2: CORE Audit (40 items)",
        "body": "Evaluate each item against the criteria in references/core-eeat-benchmark.md.\n\nScore each item:\n\nPass = 10 points (fully meets criteria)\nPartial = 5 points (partially meets criteria)\nFail = 0 points (does not meet criteria)\n\n### C — Contextual Clarity\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Intent Alignment | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| C02 | Direct Answer | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| C10 | Semantic Closure | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n\n**C Score**: [X]/100\n\nRepeat the same table format for O (Organization), R (Referenceability), and E (Exclusivity), scoring all 10 items per dimension."
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 3: EEAT Audit (40 items)",
        "body": "### Exp — Experience\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| Exp01 | First-Person Narrative | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**Exp Score**: [X]/100\n\nRepeat the same table format for Ept (Expertise), A (Authority), and T (Trust), scoring all 10 items per dimension.\n\nSee references/item-reference.md for the complete 80-item ID lookup table and site-level item handling notes."
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 4: Scoring & Report",
        "body": "Calculate scores and generate the final report:\n\n## CORE-EEAT Audit Report\n\n### Overview\n\n- **Content**: [title]\n- **Content Type**: [type]\n- **Audit Date**: [date]\n- **Total Score**: [score]/100 ([rating])\n- **GEO Score**: [score]/100 | **SEO Score**: [score]/100\n- **Veto Status**: ✅ No triggers / ⚠️ [item] triggered\n\n### Dimension Scores\n\n| Dimension | Score | Rating | Weight | Weighted |\n|-----------|-------|--------|--------|----------|\n| C — Contextual Clarity | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| O — Organization | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| R — Referenceability | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| E — Exclusivity | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| Exp — Experience | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| Ept — Expertise | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| A — Authority | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| T — Trust | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| **Weighted Total** | | | | **[X]/100** |\n\n**Score Calculation**:\n- GEO Score = (C + O + R + E) / 4\n- SEO Score = (Exp + Ept + A + T) / 4\n- Weighted Score = Σ (dimension_score × content_type_weight)\n\n**Rating Scale**: 90-100 Excellent | 75-89 Good | 60-74 Medium | 40-59 Low | 0-39 Poor\n\n### N/A Item Handling\n\nWhen an item cannot be evaluated (e.g., A01 Backlink Profile requires site-level data not available):\n\n1. Mark the item as \"N/A\" with reason\n2. Exclude N/A items from the dimension score calculation\n3. Dimension Score = (sum of scored items) / (number of scored items x 10) x 100\n4. If more than 50% of a dimension's items are N/A, flag the dimension as \"Insufficient Data\" and exclude it from the weighted total\n5. Recalculate weighted total using only dimensions with sufficient data, re-normalizing weights to sum to 100%\n\n**Example**: Authority dimension with 8 N/A items and 2 scored items (A05=8, A07=5):\n- Dimension score = (8+5) / (2 x 10) x 100 = 65\n- But 8/10 items are N/A (>50%), so flag as \"Insufficient Data -- Authority\"\n- Exclude A dimension from weighted total; redistribute its weight proportionally to remaining dimensions\n\n### Per-Item Scores\n\n#### CORE — Content Body (40 Items)\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Intent Alignment | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| C02 | Direct Answer | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n#### EEAT — Source Credibility (40 Items)\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| Exp01 | First-Person Narrative | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n### Top 5 Priority Improvements\n\nSorted by: weight × points lost (highest impact first)\n\n1. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n\n2. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n\n3–5. [Same format]\n\n### Action Plan\n\n#### Quick Wins (< 30 minutes each)\n- [ ] [Action 1]\n- [ ] [Action 2]\n\n#### Medium Effort (1-2 hours)\n- [ ] [Action 3]\n- [ ] [Action 4]\n\n#### Strategic (Requires planning)\n- [ ] [Action 5]\n- [ ] [Action 6]\n\n### Recommended Next Steps\n\n- For full content rewrite: use [seo-content-writer](../../build/seo-content-writer/) with CORE-EEAT constraints\n- For GEO optimization: use [geo-content-optimizer](../../build/geo-content-optimizer/) targeting failed GEO-First items\n- For content refresh: use [content-refresher](../../optimize/content-refresher/) with weak dimensions as focus\n- For technical fixes: run `/seo:check-technical` for site-level issues"
      },
      {
        "title": "Input Validation",
        "body": "Content source identified (text, URL, or file path)\n Content type confirmed (auto-detected or user-specified)\n Content is substantial enough for meaningful audit (≥300 words)\n If comparative audit, competitor content also provided"
      },
      {
        "title": "Output Validation",
        "body": "All 80 items scored (or marked N/A with reason)\n All 8 dimension scores calculated correctly\n Weighted total matches content-type weight configuration\n Veto items checked and flagged if triggered\n Top 5 improvements sorted by weighted impact, not arbitrary\n Every recommendation is specific and actionable (not generic advice)\n Action plan includes concrete steps with effort estimates"
      },
      {
        "title": "Example",
        "body": "See references/item-reference.md for a complete scored example showing the C dimension with all 10 items, priority improvements, and weighted scoring."
      },
      {
        "title": "Tips for Success",
        "body": "Start with veto items — T04, C01, R10 are deal-breakers regardless of total score\n\nThese veto items are consistent with the CORE-EEAT benchmark (Section 3), which defines them as items that can override the overall score.\n\n\nFocus on high-weight dimensions — Different content types prioritize different dimensions\nGEO-First items matter most for AI visibility — Prioritize items tagged GEO 🎯 if AI citation is the goal\nSome EEAT items need site-level data — Don't penalize content for things only observable at the site level (backlinks, brand recognition)\nUse the weighted score, not just the raw average — A product review with strong Exclusivity matters more than strong Authority\nRe-audit after improvements — Run again to verify score improvements and catch regressions\nPair with CITE for domain-level context — A high content score on a low-authority domain signals a different priority than the reverse; run domain-authority-auditor for the full 120-item picture"
      },
      {
        "title": "Reference Materials",
        "body": "CORE-EEAT Content Benchmark — Full 80-item benchmark with dimension definitions, scoring criteria, and GEO-First item markers\nreferences/item-reference.md — All 80 item IDs in a compact lookup table + site-level item handling notes + scored example report"
      },
      {
        "title": "Related Skills",
        "body": "domain-authority-auditor — Domain-level CITE audit (40 items) — the sister skill for full 120-item assessment\nseo-content-writer — Write content that scores high on CORE dimensions\ngeo-content-optimizer — Optimize for GEO-First items\ncontent-refresher — Update content to improve weak dimensions\non-page-seo-auditor — Technical on-page audit (complements this skill)"
      }
    ],
    "body": "Content Quality Auditor\n\nBased on CORE-EEAT Content Benchmark. Full benchmark reference: references/core-eeat-benchmark.md\n\nSEO & GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · Install all: npx skills add aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills\n\n<details> <summary>Browse all 20 skills</summary>\n\nResearch · keyword-research · competitor-analysis · serp-analysis · content-gap-analysis\n\nBuild · seo-content-writer · geo-content-optimizer · meta-tags-optimizer · schema-markup-generator\n\nOptimize · on-page-seo-auditor · technical-seo-checker · internal-linking-optimizer · content-refresher\n\nMonitor · rank-tracker · backlink-analyzer · performance-reporter · alert-manager\n\nCross-cutting · content-quality-auditor · domain-authority-auditor · entity-optimizer · memory-management\n\n</details>\n\nThis skill evaluates content quality across 80 standardized criteria organized in 8 dimensions. It produces a comprehensive audit report with per-item scoring, dimension and system scores, weighted totals by content type, and a prioritized action plan.\n\nWhen to Use This Skill\nAuditing content quality before publishing\nEvaluating existing content for improvement opportunities\nBenchmarking content against CORE-EEAT standards\nComparing content quality against competitors\nAssessing both GEO readiness (AI citation potential) and SEO strength (source credibility)\nRunning periodic content quality checks as part of a content maintenance program\nAfter writing or optimizing content with seo-content-writer or geo-content-optimizer\nWhat This Skill Does\nFull 80-Item Audit: Scores every CORE-EEAT check item as Pass/Partial/Fail\nDimension Scoring: Calculates scores for all 8 dimensions (0-100 each)\nSystem Scoring: Computes GEO Score (CORE) and SEO Score (EEAT)\nWeighted Totals: Applies content-type-specific weights for final score\nVeto Detection: Flags critical trust violations (T04, C01, R10)\nPriority Ranking: Identifies Top 5 improvements sorted by impact\nAction Plan: Generates specific, actionable improvement steps\nHow to Use\nAudit Content\nAudit this content against CORE-EEAT: [content text or URL]\n\nRun a content quality audit on [URL] as a [content type]\n\nAudit with Content Type\nCORE-EEAT audit for this product review: [content]\n\nScore this how-to guide against the 80-item benchmark: [content]\n\nComparative Audit\nAudit my content vs competitor: [your content] vs [competitor content]\n\nData Sources\n\nSee CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.\n\nWith ~~web crawler + ~~SEO tool connected: Automatically fetch page content, extract HTML structure, check schema markup, verify internal/external links, and pull competitor content for comparison.\n\nWith manual data only: Ask the user to provide:\n\nContent text, URL, or file path\nContent type (if not auto-detectable): Product Review, How-to Guide, Comparison, Landing Page, Blog Post, FAQ Page, Alternative, Best-of, or Testimonial\nOptional: competitor content for benchmarking\n\nProceed with the full 80-item audit using provided data. Note in the output which items could not be fully evaluated due to missing access (e.g., backlink data, schema markup, site-level signals).\n\nInstructions\n\nWhen a user requests a content quality audit:\n\nStep 1: Preparation\n### Audit Setup\n\n**Content**: [title or URL]\n**Content Type**: [auto-detected or user-specified]\n**Dimension Weights**: [loaded from content-type weight table]\n\n#### Veto Check (Emergency Brake)\n\n| Veto Item | Status | Action |\n|-----------|--------|--------|\n| T04: Disclosure Statements | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Add disclosure banner at page top immediately\"] |\n| C01: Intent Alignment | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Rewrite title and first paragraph\"] |\n| R10: Content Consistency | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Verify all data before publishing\"] |\n\n\nIf any veto item triggers, flag it prominently at the top of the report and recommend immediate action before continuing the full audit.\n\nStep 2: CORE Audit (40 items)\n\nEvaluate each item against the criteria in references/core-eeat-benchmark.md.\n\nScore each item:\n\nPass = 10 points (fully meets criteria)\nPartial = 5 points (partially meets criteria)\nFail = 0 points (does not meet criteria)\n### C — Contextual Clarity\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Intent Alignment | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| C02 | Direct Answer | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| C10 | Semantic Closure | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n\n**C Score**: [X]/100\n\n\nRepeat the same table format for O (Organization), R (Referenceability), and E (Exclusivity), scoring all 10 items per dimension.\n\nStep 3: EEAT Audit (40 items)\n### Exp — Experience\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| Exp01 | First-Person Narrative | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**Exp Score**: [X]/100\n\n\nRepeat the same table format for Ept (Expertise), A (Authority), and T (Trust), scoring all 10 items per dimension.\n\nSee references/item-reference.md for the complete 80-item ID lookup table and site-level item handling notes.\n\nStep 4: Scoring & Report\n\nCalculate scores and generate the final report:\n\n## CORE-EEAT Audit Report\n\n### Overview\n\n- **Content**: [title]\n- **Content Type**: [type]\n- **Audit Date**: [date]\n- **Total Score**: [score]/100 ([rating])\n- **GEO Score**: [score]/100 | **SEO Score**: [score]/100\n- **Veto Status**: ✅ No triggers / ⚠️ [item] triggered\n\n### Dimension Scores\n\n| Dimension | Score | Rating | Weight | Weighted |\n|-----------|-------|--------|--------|----------|\n| C — Contextual Clarity | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| O — Organization | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| R — Referenceability | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| E — Exclusivity | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| Exp — Experience | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| Ept — Expertise | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| A — Authority | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| T — Trust | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| **Weighted Total** | | | | **[X]/100** |\n\n**Score Calculation**:\n- GEO Score = (C + O + R + E) / 4\n- SEO Score = (Exp + Ept + A + T) / 4\n- Weighted Score = Σ (dimension_score × content_type_weight)\n\n**Rating Scale**: 90-100 Excellent | 75-89 Good | 60-74 Medium | 40-59 Low | 0-39 Poor\n\n### N/A Item Handling\n\nWhen an item cannot be evaluated (e.g., A01 Backlink Profile requires site-level data not available):\n\n1. Mark the item as \"N/A\" with reason\n2. Exclude N/A items from the dimension score calculation\n3. Dimension Score = (sum of scored items) / (number of scored items x 10) x 100\n4. If more than 50% of a dimension's items are N/A, flag the dimension as \"Insufficient Data\" and exclude it from the weighted total\n5. Recalculate weighted total using only dimensions with sufficient data, re-normalizing weights to sum to 100%\n\n**Example**: Authority dimension with 8 N/A items and 2 scored items (A05=8, A07=5):\n- Dimension score = (8+5) / (2 x 10) x 100 = 65\n- But 8/10 items are N/A (>50%), so flag as \"Insufficient Data -- Authority\"\n- Exclude A dimension from weighted total; redistribute its weight proportionally to remaining dimensions\n\n### Per-Item Scores\n\n#### CORE — Content Body (40 Items)\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Intent Alignment | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| C02 | Direct Answer | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n#### EEAT — Source Credibility (40 Items)\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| Exp01 | First-Person Narrative | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n### Top 5 Priority Improvements\n\nSorted by: weight × points lost (highest impact first)\n\n1. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n\n2. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n\n3–5. [Same format]\n\n### Action Plan\n\n#### Quick Wins (< 30 minutes each)\n- [ ] [Action 1]\n- [ ] [Action 2]\n\n#### Medium Effort (1-2 hours)\n- [ ] [Action 3]\n- [ ] [Action 4]\n\n#### Strategic (Requires planning)\n- [ ] [Action 5]\n- [ ] [Action 6]\n\n### Recommended Next Steps\n\n- For full content rewrite: use [seo-content-writer](../../build/seo-content-writer/) with CORE-EEAT constraints\n- For GEO optimization: use [geo-content-optimizer](../../build/geo-content-optimizer/) targeting failed GEO-First items\n- For content refresh: use [content-refresher](../../optimize/content-refresher/) with weak dimensions as focus\n- For technical fixes: run `/seo:check-technical` for site-level issues\n\nValidation Checkpoints\nInput Validation\n Content source identified (text, URL, or file path)\n Content type confirmed (auto-detected or user-specified)\n Content is substantial enough for meaningful audit (≥300 words)\n If comparative audit, competitor content also provided\nOutput Validation\n All 80 items scored (or marked N/A with reason)\n All 8 dimension scores calculated correctly\n Weighted total matches content-type weight configuration\n Veto items checked and flagged if triggered\n Top 5 improvements sorted by weighted impact, not arbitrary\n Every recommendation is specific and actionable (not generic advice)\n Action plan includes concrete steps with effort estimates\nExample\n\nSee references/item-reference.md for a complete scored example showing the C dimension with all 10 items, priority improvements, and weighted scoring.\n\nTips for Success\nStart with veto items — T04, C01, R10 are deal-breakers regardless of total score\n\nThese veto items are consistent with the CORE-EEAT benchmark (Section 3), which defines them as items that can override the overall score.\n\nFocus on high-weight dimensions — Different content types prioritize different dimensions\nGEO-First items matter most for AI visibility — Prioritize items tagged GEO 🎯 if AI citation is the goal\nSome EEAT items need site-level data — Don't penalize content for things only observable at the site level (backlinks, brand recognition)\nUse the weighted score, not just the raw average — A product review with strong Exclusivity matters more than strong Authority\nRe-audit after improvements — Run again to verify score improvements and catch regressions\nPair with CITE for domain-level context — A high content score on a low-authority domain signals a different priority than the reverse; run domain-authority-auditor for the full 120-item picture\nReference Materials\nCORE-EEAT Content Benchmark — Full 80-item benchmark with dimension definitions, scoring criteria, and GEO-First item markers\nreferences/item-reference.md — All 80 item IDs in a compact lookup table + site-level item handling notes + scored example report\nRelated Skills\ndomain-authority-auditor — Domain-level CITE audit (40 items) — the sister skill for full 120-item assessment\nseo-content-writer — Write content that scores high on CORE dimensions\ngeo-content-optimizer — Optimize for GEO-First items\ncontent-refresher — Update content to improve weak dimensions\non-page-seo-auditor — Technical on-page audit (complements this skill)"
  },
  "trust": {
    "sourceLabel": "tencent",
    "provenanceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/content-quality-auditor",
    "publisherUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/content-quality-auditor",
    "owner": "aaron-he-zhu",
    "version": "3.0.0",
    "license": null,
    "verificationStatus": "Indexed source record"
  },
  "links": {
    "detailUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/content-quality-auditor",
    "downloadUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/content-quality-auditor",
    "agentUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/content-quality-auditor/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/content-quality-auditor/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/content-quality-auditor/agent.md"
  }
}