{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "item": {
    "slug": "domain-authority-auditor",
    "name": "Domain Authority Auditor",
    "source": "tencent",
    "type": "skill",
    "category": "数据分析",
    "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/domain-authority-auditor",
    "canonicalUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/domain-authority-auditor",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw"
  },
  "install": {
    "downloadMode": "redirect",
    "downloadUrl": "/downloads/domain-authority-auditor",
    "sourceDownloadUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=domain-authority-auditor",
    "sourcePlatform": "tencent",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw",
    "installMethod": "Manual import",
    "extraction": "Extract archive",
    "prerequisites": [
      "OpenClaw"
    ],
    "packageFormat": "ZIP package",
    "includedAssets": [
      "SKILL.md",
      "references/example-report.md"
    ],
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "quickSetup": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.",
      "Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup."
    ],
    "agentAssist": {
      "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
      "steps": [
        "Download the package from Yavira.",
        "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
        "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
      ],
      "prompts": [
        {
          "label": "New install",
          "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
        },
        {
          "label": "Upgrade existing",
          "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
        }
      ]
    },
    "sourceHealth": {
      "source": "tencent",
      "status": "healthy",
      "reason": "direct_download_ok",
      "recommendedAction": "download",
      "checkedAt": "2026-04-23T16:43:11.935Z",
      "expiresAt": "2026-04-30T16:43:11.935Z",
      "httpStatus": 200,
      "finalUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=4claw-imageboard",
      "contentType": "application/zip",
      "probeMethod": "head",
      "details": {
        "probeUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=4claw-imageboard",
        "contentDisposition": "attachment; filename=\"4claw-imageboard-1.0.1.zip\"",
        "redirectLocation": null,
        "bodySnippet": null
      },
      "scope": "source",
      "summary": "Source download looks usable.",
      "detail": "Yavira can redirect you to the upstream package for this source.",
      "primaryActionLabel": "Download for OpenClaw",
      "primaryActionHref": "/downloads/domain-authority-auditor"
    },
    "validation": {
      "installChecklist": [
        "Use the Yavira download entry.",
        "Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.",
        "Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets."
      ],
      "postInstallChecks": [
        "Confirm the extracted package includes the expected docs or setup files.",
        "Validate the skill or prompts are available in your target agent workspace.",
        "Capture any manual follow-up steps the agent could not complete."
      ]
    },
    "downloadPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/domain-authority-auditor",
    "agentPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/domain-authority-auditor/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/domain-authority-auditor/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/domain-authority-auditor/agent.md"
  },
  "agentAssist": {
    "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
    "steps": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
      "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
    ],
    "prompts": [
      {
        "label": "New install",
        "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
      },
      {
        "label": "Upgrade existing",
        "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
      }
    ]
  },
  "documentation": {
    "source": "clawhub",
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "Domain Authority Auditor",
        "body": "Based on CITE Domain Rating. Full benchmark reference: references/cite-domain-rating.md\n\nSEO & GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · Install all: npx skills add aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills\n\nResearch · keyword-research · competitor-analysis · serp-analysis · content-gap-analysis\n\nBuild · seo-content-writer · geo-content-optimizer · meta-tags-optimizer · schema-markup-generator\n\nOptimize · on-page-seo-auditor · technical-seo-checker · internal-linking-optimizer · content-refresher\n\nMonitor · rank-tracker · backlink-analyzer · performance-reporter · alert-manager\n\nCross-cutting · content-quality-auditor · domain-authority-auditor · entity-optimizer · memory-management\n\nThis skill evaluates domain authority across 40 standardized criteria organized in 4 dimensions. It produces a comprehensive audit report with per-item scoring, dimension and weighted scores by domain type, veto item checks, and a prioritized action plan.\n\nSister skill: content-quality-auditor evaluates content at the page level (80 items). This skill evaluates the domain behind the content (40 items). Together they provide a complete 120-item assessment.\n\nNamespace note: CITE uses C01-C10 for Citation items; CORE-EEAT uses C01-C10 for Contextual Clarity items. In combined 120-item assessments, prefix with the framework name (e.g., CITE-C01 vs CORE-C01) to avoid confusion."
      },
      {
        "title": "When to Use This Skill",
        "body": "Evaluating domain authority before a GEO campaign\nBenchmarking your domain against competitors\nAssessing whether a domain is trustworthy as a citation source\nRunning periodic domain health checks or after link building campaigns\nIdentifying manipulation red flags (PBNs, link farms, penalty history)\nCross-referencing with content-quality-auditor for full 120-item assessment"
      },
      {
        "title": "What This Skill Does",
        "body": "Full 40-Item Audit: Scores every CITE check item as Pass/Partial/Fail\nDimension Scoring: Calculates scores for all 4 dimensions (0-100 each)\nWeighted Totals: Applies domain-type-specific weights for CITE Score\nVeto Detection: Flags critical manipulation signals (T03, T05, T09)\nPriority Ranking: Identifies Top 5 improvements sorted by impact\nAction Plan: Generates specific, actionable improvement steps\nCross-Reference: Optionally pairs with CORE-EEAT for combined diagnosis"
      },
      {
        "title": "Audit Your Domain",
        "body": "Audit domain authority for [domain]\nRun a CITE domain audit on [domain] as a [domain type]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Audit with Domain Type",
        "body": "CITE audit for example.com as an e-commerce site\nScore this SaaS domain against the 40-item benchmark: [domain]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Comparative Audit",
        "body": "Compare domain authority: [your domain] vs [competitor 1] vs [competitor 2]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Combined Assessment",
        "body": "Run full 120-item assessment on [domain]: CITE domain audit + CORE-EEAT content audit on [sample pages]"
      },
      {
        "title": "Data Sources",
        "body": "See CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.\n\nWith ~~link database + ~~SEO tool + ~~AI monitor + ~~knowledge graph + ~~brand monitor connected:\nAutomatically pull backlink profiles and link quality metrics from ~~link database, domain authority scores and keyword rankings from ~~SEO tool, AI citation data from ~~AI monitor, entity presence from ~~knowledge graph, and brand mention data from ~~brand monitor.\n\nWith manual data only:\nAsk the user to provide:\n\nDomain to evaluate\nDomain type (if not auto-detectable): Content Publisher, Product & Service, E-commerce, Community & UGC, Tool & Utility, or Authority & Institutional\nBacklink data: referring domains count, domain authority, top linking domains\nTraffic estimates (from any SEO tool or SimilarWeb)\nCompetitor domains for comparison (optional)\n\nProceed with the full 40-item audit using provided data. Note in the output which items could not be fully evaluated due to missing access (e.g., AI citation data, knowledge graph queries, WHOIS history)."
      },
      {
        "title": "Instructions",
        "body": "When a user requests a domain authority audit:"
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 1: Preparation",
        "body": "### Audit Setup\n\n**Domain**: [domain]\n**Domain Type**: [auto-detected or user-specified]\n**Dimension Weights**: [from domain-type weight table below]\n\n#### Domain-Type Weight Table\n\n> Canonical source: `references/cite-domain-rating.md`. This inline copy is for convenience.\n\n| Dim | Default | Content Publisher | Product & Service | E-commerce | Community & UGC | Tool & Utility | Authority & Institutional |\n|-----|:-------:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|\n| C | 35% | **40%** | 25% | 20% | 35% | 25% | **45%** |\n| I | 20% | 15% | **30%** | 20% | 10% | **30%** | 20% |\n| T | 25% | 20% | 25% | **35%** | 25% | 25% | 20% |\n| E | 20% | 25% | 20% | 25% | **30%** | 20% | 15% |\n\n#### Veto Check (Emergency Brake)\n\n| Veto Item | Status | Action |\n|-----------|--------|--------|\n| T03: Link-Traffic Coherence | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Audit backlink profile; disavow toxic links\"] |\n| T05: Backlink Profile Uniqueness | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Flag as manipulation network; investigate link sources\"] |\n| T09: Penalty & Deindex History | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Address penalty first; all other optimization is futile\"] |\n\nIf any veto item triggers, flag it prominently at the top of the report. CITE Score is capped at 39 (Poor) regardless of other scores."
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 2: C + I Audit (20 items)",
        "body": "Evaluate each item against the criteria in references/cite-domain-rating.md.\n\nScore each item:\n\nPass = 10 points (fully meets criteria)\nPartial = 5 points (partially meets criteria)\nFail = 0 points (does not meet criteria)\n\n### C — Citation\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Referring Domains Volume | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| C02 | Referring Domains Quality | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| C10 | Link Source Diversity | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n\n**C Score**: [X]/100\n\n### I — Identity\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| I01 | Knowledge Graph Presence | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**I Score**: [X]/100"
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 3: T + E Audit (20 items)",
        "body": "Same format for Trust and Eminence dimensions.\n\n### T — Trust\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| T01 | Link Profile Naturalness | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**T Score**: [X]/100\n\n### E — Eminence\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| E01 | Organic Search Visibility | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**E Score**: [X]/100\n\nNote: Some items require specialized data (C05-C08 AI citation data, I01 knowledge graph queries, T04-T05 IP/profile analysis). Score what is observable; mark unverifiable items as \"N/A — requires [data source]\" and exclude from dimension average."
      },
      {
        "title": "Step 4: Scoring & Report",
        "body": "Calculate scores and generate the final report:\n\n## CITE Domain Authority Report\n\n### Overview\n\n- **Domain**: [domain]\n- **Domain Type**: [type]\n- **Audit Date**: [date]\n- **CITE Score**: [score]/100 ([rating])\n- **Veto Status**: ✅ No triggers / ⚠️ [item] triggered — Score capped at 39\n\n### Dimension Scores\n\n| Dimension | Score | Rating | Weight | Weighted |\n|-----------|-------|--------|--------|----------|\n| C — Citation | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| I — Identity | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| T — Trust | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| E — Eminence | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| **CITE Score** | | | | **[X]/100** |\n\n**Score Calculation**: CITE Score = C × [w_C] + I × [w_I] + T × [w_T] + E × [w_E]\n\n**Rating Scale**: 90-100 Excellent | 75-89 Good | 60-74 Medium | 40-59 Low | 0-39 Poor\n\n### Per-Item Scores\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Referring Domains Volume | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| C02 | Referring Domains Quality | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| E10 | Industry Share of Voice | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n\n### Top 5 Priority Improvements\n\nSorted by: weight × points lost (highest impact first)\n\n1. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n2. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n3–5. [Same format]\n\n### Action Plan\n\n#### Quick Wins (< 1 week)\n- [ ] [Action 1]\n- [ ] [Action 2]\n#### Medium Effort (1-4 weeks)\n- [ ] [Action 3]\n- [ ] [Action 4]\n#### Strategic (1-3 months)\n- [ ] [Action 5]\n- [ ] [Action 6]\n\n### Cross-Reference with CORE-EEAT\n\nFor a complete assessment, pair this CITE audit with a CORE-EEAT content audit:\n\n| Assessment | Score | Rating |\n|-----------|-------|--------|\n| CITE (Domain) | [X]/100 | [rating] |\n| CORE-EEAT (Content) | [Run content-quality-auditor on sample pages] | — |\n\n**Diagnosis Matrix**:\n- High CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Maintain and expand\n- High CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Prioritize content quality\n- Low CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Build domain authority\n- Low CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Start with content, then domain\n\n### Recommended Next Steps\n\n- For domain authority building: focus on top 5 priorities above\n- For content improvement: use [content-quality-auditor](../content-quality-auditor/) on key pages\n- For backlink strategy: use [backlink-analyzer](../../monitor/backlink-analyzer/) for detailed link analysis\n- For competitor benchmarking: use [competitor-analysis](../../research/competitor-analysis/) with CITE scores\n- For tracking progress: run `/seo:report` with CITE score trends"
      },
      {
        "title": "Input Validation",
        "body": "Domain identified and accessible\n Domain type confirmed (auto-detected or user-specified)\n Backlink data available (at minimum: referring domains count, DA/DR)\n If comparative audit, competitor domains also specified"
      },
      {
        "title": "Output Validation",
        "body": "All 40 items scored (or marked N/A with reason)\n All 4 dimension scores calculated correctly\n Weighted CITE Score matches domain-type weight configuration\n All 3 veto items checked first and flagged if triggered\n Top 5 improvements sorted by weighted impact, not arbitrary\n Every recommendation is specific and actionable (not generic advice)\n Action plan includes concrete steps with effort estimates"
      },
      {
        "title": "Example",
        "body": "See references/example-report.md for a complete CITE audit of cloudhosting.com showing veto check, dimension scores, top 5 improvements, action plan, and cross-reference with CORE-EEAT."
      },
      {
        "title": "Tips for Success",
        "body": "Start with veto items — T03, T05, T09 can invalidate the entire score\nIdentify domain type first — Different types have very different weight profiles\nAI citation items (C05-C08) matter most for GEO — Test by querying AI engines with niche-relevant questions\nSome items need specialized tools — Knowledge graph queries, AI citation monitoring, and IP diversity analysis may require manual research if tools aren't connected\nPair with CORE-EEAT for full picture — Domain authority without content quality (or vice versa) tells only half the story"
      },
      {
        "title": "Reference Materials",
        "body": "CITE Domain Rating — Full 40-item benchmark with dimension definitions, scoring criteria, domain-type weight tables, and veto items\nreferences/example-report.md — Complete CITE audit example with scored dimensions, top 5 improvements, action plan, and CORE-EEAT cross-reference"
      },
      {
        "title": "Related Skills",
        "body": "content-quality-auditor — Page-level content audit (CORE-EEAT 80 items) — the sister skill\nbacklink-analyzer — Deep-dive into backlink profile (feeds C dimension data)\ncompetitor-analysis — Compare CITE scores across competitors\nperformance-reporter — Track CITE score trends over time\nentity-optimizer — Entity presence audit; complements CITE I dimension"
      }
    ],
    "body": "Domain Authority Auditor\n\nBased on CITE Domain Rating. Full benchmark reference: references/cite-domain-rating.md\n\nSEO & GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · Install all: npx skills add aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills\n\n<details> <summary>Browse all 20 skills</summary>\n\nResearch · keyword-research · competitor-analysis · serp-analysis · content-gap-analysis\n\nBuild · seo-content-writer · geo-content-optimizer · meta-tags-optimizer · schema-markup-generator\n\nOptimize · on-page-seo-auditor · technical-seo-checker · internal-linking-optimizer · content-refresher\n\nMonitor · rank-tracker · backlink-analyzer · performance-reporter · alert-manager\n\nCross-cutting · content-quality-auditor · domain-authority-auditor · entity-optimizer · memory-management\n\n</details>\n\nThis skill evaluates domain authority across 40 standardized criteria organized in 4 dimensions. It produces a comprehensive audit report with per-item scoring, dimension and weighted scores by domain type, veto item checks, and a prioritized action plan.\n\nSister skill: content-quality-auditor evaluates content at the page level (80 items). This skill evaluates the domain behind the content (40 items). Together they provide a complete 120-item assessment.\n\nNamespace note: CITE uses C01-C10 for Citation items; CORE-EEAT uses C01-C10 for Contextual Clarity items. In combined 120-item assessments, prefix with the framework name (e.g., CITE-C01 vs CORE-C01) to avoid confusion.\n\nWhen to Use This Skill\nEvaluating domain authority before a GEO campaign\nBenchmarking your domain against competitors\nAssessing whether a domain is trustworthy as a citation source\nRunning periodic domain health checks or after link building campaigns\nIdentifying manipulation red flags (PBNs, link farms, penalty history)\nCross-referencing with content-quality-auditor for full 120-item assessment\nWhat This Skill Does\nFull 40-Item Audit: Scores every CITE check item as Pass/Partial/Fail\nDimension Scoring: Calculates scores for all 4 dimensions (0-100 each)\nWeighted Totals: Applies domain-type-specific weights for CITE Score\nVeto Detection: Flags critical manipulation signals (T03, T05, T09)\nPriority Ranking: Identifies Top 5 improvements sorted by impact\nAction Plan: Generates specific, actionable improvement steps\nCross-Reference: Optionally pairs with CORE-EEAT for combined diagnosis\nHow to Use\nAudit Your Domain\nAudit domain authority for [domain]\nRun a CITE domain audit on [domain] as a [domain type]\n\nAudit with Domain Type\nCITE audit for example.com as an e-commerce site\nScore this SaaS domain against the 40-item benchmark: [domain]\n\nComparative Audit\nCompare domain authority: [your domain] vs [competitor 1] vs [competitor 2]\n\nCombined Assessment\nRun full 120-item assessment on [domain]: CITE domain audit + CORE-EEAT content audit on [sample pages]\n\nData Sources\n\nSee CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.\n\nWith ~~link database + ~~SEO tool + ~~AI monitor + ~~knowledge graph + ~~brand monitor connected: Automatically pull backlink profiles and link quality metrics from ~~link database, domain authority scores and keyword rankings from ~~SEO tool, AI citation data from ~~AI monitor, entity presence from ~~knowledge graph, and brand mention data from ~~brand monitor.\n\nWith manual data only: Ask the user to provide:\n\nDomain to evaluate\nDomain type (if not auto-detectable): Content Publisher, Product & Service, E-commerce, Community & UGC, Tool & Utility, or Authority & Institutional\nBacklink data: referring domains count, domain authority, top linking domains\nTraffic estimates (from any SEO tool or SimilarWeb)\nCompetitor domains for comparison (optional)\n\nProceed with the full 40-item audit using provided data. Note in the output which items could not be fully evaluated due to missing access (e.g., AI citation data, knowledge graph queries, WHOIS history).\n\nInstructions\n\nWhen a user requests a domain authority audit:\n\nStep 1: Preparation\n### Audit Setup\n\n**Domain**: [domain]\n**Domain Type**: [auto-detected or user-specified]\n**Dimension Weights**: [from domain-type weight table below]\n\n#### Domain-Type Weight Table\n\n> Canonical source: `references/cite-domain-rating.md`. This inline copy is for convenience.\n\n| Dim | Default | Content Publisher | Product & Service | E-commerce | Community & UGC | Tool & Utility | Authority & Institutional |\n|-----|:-------:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|\n| C | 35% | **40%** | 25% | 20% | 35% | 25% | **45%** |\n| I | 20% | 15% | **30%** | 20% | 10% | **30%** | 20% |\n| T | 25% | 20% | 25% | **35%** | 25% | 25% | 20% |\n| E | 20% | 25% | 20% | 25% | **30%** | 20% | 15% |\n\n#### Veto Check (Emergency Brake)\n\n| Veto Item | Status | Action |\n|-----------|--------|--------|\n| T03: Link-Traffic Coherence | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Audit backlink profile; disavow toxic links\"] |\n| T05: Backlink Profile Uniqueness | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Flag as manipulation network; investigate link sources\"] |\n| T09: Penalty & Deindex History | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: \"Address penalty first; all other optimization is futile\"] |\n\n\nIf any veto item triggers, flag it prominently at the top of the report. CITE Score is capped at 39 (Poor) regardless of other scores.\n\nStep 2: C + I Audit (20 items)\n\nEvaluate each item against the criteria in references/cite-domain-rating.md.\n\nScore each item:\n\nPass = 10 points (fully meets criteria)\nPartial = 5 points (partially meets criteria)\nFail = 0 points (does not meet criteria)\n### C — Citation\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Referring Domains Volume | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| C02 | Referring Domains Quality | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| C10 | Link Source Diversity | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n\n**C Score**: [X]/100\n\n### I — Identity\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| I01 | Knowledge Graph Presence | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**I Score**: [X]/100\n\nStep 3: T + E Audit (20 items)\n\nSame format for Trust and Eminence dimensions.\n\n### T — Trust\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| T01 | Link Profile Naturalness | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**T Score**: [X]/100\n\n### E — Eminence\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| E01 | Organic Search Visibility | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n\n**E Score**: [X]/100\n\n\nNote: Some items require specialized data (C05-C08 AI citation data, I01 knowledge graph queries, T04-T05 IP/profile analysis). Score what is observable; mark unverifiable items as \"N/A — requires [data source]\" and exclude from dimension average.\n\nStep 4: Scoring & Report\n\nCalculate scores and generate the final report:\n\n## CITE Domain Authority Report\n\n### Overview\n\n- **Domain**: [domain]\n- **Domain Type**: [type]\n- **Audit Date**: [date]\n- **CITE Score**: [score]/100 ([rating])\n- **Veto Status**: ✅ No triggers / ⚠️ [item] triggered — Score capped at 39\n\n### Dimension Scores\n\n| Dimension | Score | Rating | Weight | Weighted |\n|-----------|-------|--------|--------|----------|\n| C — Citation | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| I — Identity | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| T — Trust | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| E — Eminence | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |\n| **CITE Score** | | | | **[X]/100** |\n\n**Score Calculation**: CITE Score = C × [w_C] + I × [w_I] + T × [w_T] + E × [w_E]\n\n**Rating Scale**: 90-100 Excellent | 75-89 Good | 60-74 Medium | 40-59 Low | 0-39 Poor\n\n### Per-Item Scores\n\n| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |\n|----|-----------|-------|-------|\n| C01 | Referring Domains Volume | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| C02 | Referring Domains Quality | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n| ... | ... | ... | ... |\n| E10 | Industry Share of Voice | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |\n\n### Top 5 Priority Improvements\n\nSorted by: weight × points lost (highest impact first)\n\n1. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n2. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]\n   - Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points\n   - Action: [concrete step]\n3–5. [Same format]\n\n### Action Plan\n\n#### Quick Wins (< 1 week)\n- [ ] [Action 1]\n- [ ] [Action 2]\n#### Medium Effort (1-4 weeks)\n- [ ] [Action 3]\n- [ ] [Action 4]\n#### Strategic (1-3 months)\n- [ ] [Action 5]\n- [ ] [Action 6]\n\n### Cross-Reference with CORE-EEAT\n\nFor a complete assessment, pair this CITE audit with a CORE-EEAT content audit:\n\n| Assessment | Score | Rating |\n|-----------|-------|--------|\n| CITE (Domain) | [X]/100 | [rating] |\n| CORE-EEAT (Content) | [Run content-quality-auditor on sample pages] | — |\n\n**Diagnosis Matrix**:\n- High CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Maintain and expand\n- High CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Prioritize content quality\n- Low CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Build domain authority\n- Low CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Start with content, then domain\n\n### Recommended Next Steps\n\n- For domain authority building: focus on top 5 priorities above\n- For content improvement: use [content-quality-auditor](../content-quality-auditor/) on key pages\n- For backlink strategy: use [backlink-analyzer](../../monitor/backlink-analyzer/) for detailed link analysis\n- For competitor benchmarking: use [competitor-analysis](../../research/competitor-analysis/) with CITE scores\n- For tracking progress: run `/seo:report` with CITE score trends\n\nValidation Checkpoints\nInput Validation\n Domain identified and accessible\n Domain type confirmed (auto-detected or user-specified)\n Backlink data available (at minimum: referring domains count, DA/DR)\n If comparative audit, competitor domains also specified\nOutput Validation\n All 40 items scored (or marked N/A with reason)\n All 4 dimension scores calculated correctly\n Weighted CITE Score matches domain-type weight configuration\n All 3 veto items checked first and flagged if triggered\n Top 5 improvements sorted by weighted impact, not arbitrary\n Every recommendation is specific and actionable (not generic advice)\n Action plan includes concrete steps with effort estimates\nExample\n\nSee references/example-report.md for a complete CITE audit of cloudhosting.com showing veto check, dimension scores, top 5 improvements, action plan, and cross-reference with CORE-EEAT.\n\nTips for Success\nStart with veto items — T03, T05, T09 can invalidate the entire score\nIdentify domain type first — Different types have very different weight profiles\nAI citation items (C05-C08) matter most for GEO — Test by querying AI engines with niche-relevant questions\nSome items need specialized tools — Knowledge graph queries, AI citation monitoring, and IP diversity analysis may require manual research if tools aren't connected\nPair with CORE-EEAT for full picture — Domain authority without content quality (or vice versa) tells only half the story\nReference Materials\nCITE Domain Rating — Full 40-item benchmark with dimension definitions, scoring criteria, domain-type weight tables, and veto items\nreferences/example-report.md — Complete CITE audit example with scored dimensions, top 5 improvements, action plan, and CORE-EEAT cross-reference\nRelated Skills\ncontent-quality-auditor — Page-level content audit (CORE-EEAT 80 items) — the sister skill\nbacklink-analyzer — Deep-dive into backlink profile (feeds C dimension data)\ncompetitor-analysis — Compare CITE scores across competitors\nperformance-reporter — Track CITE score trends over time\nentity-optimizer — Entity presence audit; complements CITE I dimension"
  },
  "trust": {
    "sourceLabel": "tencent",
    "provenanceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/domain-authority-auditor",
    "publisherUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/aaron-he-zhu/domain-authority-auditor",
    "owner": "aaron-he-zhu",
    "version": "3.0.0",
    "license": null,
    "verificationStatus": "Indexed source record"
  },
  "links": {
    "detailUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/domain-authority-auditor",
    "downloadUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/domain-authority-auditor",
    "agentUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/domain-authority-auditor/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/domain-authority-auditor/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/domain-authority-auditor/agent.md"
  }
}