Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Tencent SkillHub · Developer Tools
the ediscovery claw
E-Discovery costs $3,000+ per GB when outsourced. edisclaw processes, deduplicates, culls, and searches ESI collections locally for a fraction of the cost—gi...
skill openclawclawhub Free
E-Discovery costs $3,000+ per GB when outsourced. edisclaw processes, deduplicates, culls, and searches ESI collections locally for a fraction of the cost—gi...
⬇ 0 downloads ★ 0 stars Unverified but indexed
Install for OpenClaw
Quick setup
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
- Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.
Package facts
- Download mode
- Yavira redirect
- Package format
- ZIP package
- Source platform
- Tencent SkillHub
- What's included
- _meta.json, SKILL.md
Validation
- Use the Yavira download entry.
- Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
- Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.
Install with your agent
Agent handoff
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
- Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
Upgrade existing
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Trust & source
Release facts
- Source
- Tencent SkillHub
- Verification
- Indexed source record
- Version
- 1.0.0
Provenance
- Publisher
- jagadeeshmurali-coder
- Source page
- View original listing
- Canonical URL
- Open canonical page
Documentation
edisclaw
E-Discovery shouldn't cost more than the lawsuit. Firms spend $3,000–$18,000 per gigabyte outsourcing e-discovery. edisclaw brings the entire processing pipeline into your terminal—collect, deduplicate, cull by keyword and date, tag for relevance, and export production-ready load files. All locally. All under your control. You don't need a vendor. You need a command. Who it's for: Litigators handling discovery, paralegals managing document review, solo attorneys who can't afford Relativity, and in-house teams running internal investigations. What it replaces: $50K+ vendor invoices, Relativity seats you don't need, and the 3-week turnaround that kills your case timeline.
Pricing
FeatureFreePro ($49/mo)Litigation ($199/mo)ESI processingUp to 1 GBUp to 50 GBUnlimitedDeduplicationMD5 onlyMD5 + fuzzy near-dedupFull near-dedup + email threadingKeyword searchBasic grepRegex + proximity + stemmingFull-text index + BooleanDate culling✅✅✅File type filtering✅✅✅TAR (Technology Assisted Review)—Seed set + prioritizeFull active learning loopLoad file export—Concordance (.dat)Concordance + Relativity + EDRM XMLEmail threading—BasicFull conversation threadingOCR for scanned docs—✅✅ + batchMatters1 active10 activeUnlimitedTeam reviewers——Up to 15Audit trailBasicFullFull + court-ready certification edisclaw upgrade pro — 14-day free trial.
Core Commands
Collection & Ingestion edisclaw ingest ./custodian_files/ --matter "Smith v. Jones" edisclaw ingest mailbox.pst --matter "Smith v. Jones" --custodian "J. Smith" edisclaw ingest ./emails/ --format mbox --matter "Smith v. Jones" edisclaw ingest --source gdrive --custodian "CEO" --matter "Investigation" (Pro) edisclaw status --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Processing progress Deduplication edisclaw dedup --matter "Smith v. Jones" — MD5 exact dedup edisclaw dedup --matter "Smith v. Jones" --near — Near-dedup (Pro) edisclaw dedup report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — How much was removed Culling & Filtering edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --date-from 2024-01-01 --date-to 2025-12-31 edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --filetype pdf,docx,xlsx,msg edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --exclude-filetype jpg,png,gif — Remove images edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --min-size 1KB — Remove empty/tiny files edisclaw cull report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Culling summary Keyword Search edisclaw search "merger" --matter "Smith v. Jones" edisclaw search "merger AND acquisition" --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Boolean edisclaw search "merger w/5 acquisition" --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Proximity (Pro) edisclaw search --terms-file keywords.txt --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Batch keyword list edisclaw search --report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Keyword hit report Review & Tagging edisclaw review start --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Interactive review mode edisclaw tag --id DOC-001234 --tags "responsive,hot" — Tag documents edisclaw tag --id DOC-001234 --privilege "attorney-client" — Privilege tag edisclaw review stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Review progress Technology Assisted Review (Litigation) edisclaw tar seed --matter "Smith v. Jones" --count 200 — Generate seed set edisclaw tar train --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Train model on coded docs edisclaw tar prioritize --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Rank by likely relevance edisclaw tar validate --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Statistical validation edisclaw tar report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Court-defensible TAR report Production edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --tag "responsive" --format concordance edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --bates-prefix "SMITH" --start 000001 edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --redact-pii --format pdf (Litigation) edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --format edrm-xml (Litigation) edisclaw produce log --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Production log Reporting edisclaw stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Full matter statistics edisclaw stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" --by-custodian — Per custodian breakdown edisclaw stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" --by-filetype — File type distribution edisclaw timeline --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Document timeline visualization
Common Workflows
Standard E-Discovery Pipeline # 1. Ingest custodian data edisclaw ingest ./custodian_smith/ --matter "Case-2026" --custodian "Smith" edisclaw ingest ./custodian_jones/ --matter "Case-2026" --custodian "Jones" # 2. Deduplicate edisclaw dedup --matter "Case-2026" # 3. Date & file type culling edisclaw cull --matter "Case-2026" --date-from 2023-01-01 --date-to 2025-12-31 # 4. Keyword search edisclaw search --terms-file agreed_keywords.txt --matter "Case-2026" # 5. Review & tag edisclaw review start --matter "Case-2026" # 6. Produce edisclaw produce --matter "Case-2026" --tag "responsive" --bates-prefix "PROD" --start 000001
Notes
All data stored locally in ~/.edisclaw/ — ESI never leaves your machine on Free tier Processing speeds: ~2 GB/hour on Free, ~10 GB/hour on Pro (parallelized) Supports: PST, MBOX, EML, MSG, PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, TXT, CSV, HTML, images Combine with privilegeclaw for automated privilege detection Combine with batesclaw for advanced Bates numbering workflows Court-defensible audit logs on all tiers
Security & Compliance
No data transmitted externally on Free tier Pro/Litigation: encrypted API for TAR models only (no document content sent) EDRM framework compliant Chain of custody logging: edisclaw audit --matter "Smith v. Jones" Defensibility report: edisclaw defensibility-report --matter "Smith v. Jones" (Litigation)
Category context
Code helpers, APIs, CLIs, browser automation, testing, and developer operations.
Source: Tencent SkillHub
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.
Package contents
Included in package
1 Docs1 Config
- SKILL.md
- _meta.json