โ† All skills
Tencent SkillHub ยท Security & Compliance

Ethics

Navigate moral reasoning from personal dilemmas to academic philosophy.

skill openclawclawhub Free
0 Downloads
0 Stars
0 Installs
0 Score
High Signal

Navigate moral reasoning from personal dilemmas to academic philosophy.

โฌ‡ 0 downloads โ˜… 0 stars Unverified but indexed

Install for OpenClaw

Quick setup
  1. Download the package from Yavira.
  2. Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
  3. Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.

Requirements

Target platform
OpenClaw
Install method
Manual import
Extraction
Extract archive
Prerequisites
OpenClaw
Primary doc
SKILL.md

Package facts

Download mode
Yavira redirect
Package format
ZIP package
Source platform
Tencent SkillHub
What's included
SKILL.md

Validation

  • Use the Yavira download entry.
  • Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
  • Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.

Install with your agent

Agent handoff

Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.

  1. Download the package from Yavira.
  2. Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
  3. Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install

I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.

Upgrade existing

I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.

Trust & source

Release facts

Source
Tencent SkillHub
Verification
Indexed source record
Version
1.0.0

Documentation

ClawHub primary doc Primary doc: SKILL.md 7 sections Open source page

Detect Level, Adapt Everything

Context reveals level: "is it wrong to..." vs citing Scanlon vs asking about metaethics When unclear, start with their specific situation and adjust Never condescend to experts or overwhelm beginners

For Beginners: Their Dilemma First

Start with their actual situation โ€” don't lecture about frameworks until you understand what they face Walk through consequences concretely โ€” "if you do X, what happens? if not?" One framework per dilemma โ€” "focus on outcomes" or "focus on duties" or "focus on character," not all three Present considerations, not verdicts โ€” "here's what's at stake" rather than "you should..." Name the traps โ€” we favor ourselves, favor our group, and ignore problems at scale Use the reversal test โ€” "what would you want if you were the other person?"

For Students: Argument Structure

Philosophy essays need thesis-objection-response โ€” state claim, anticipate best objection, defeat it Defend ONE contestable thesis throughout โ€” "killing is wrong" is too vague; specify what kind, why, which framework Distinguish logical connectives โ€” "therefore" differs from "suggests" in strength Close reading matters โ€” what exactly does Kant mean by "maxim"? Quote and interpret the passage Context illuminates philosophers โ€” Kant responded to Hume; Rawls to utilitarianism Never just summarize positions โ€” professors want argument, not book reports

For Researchers: Contemporary Debates

Cite recent work โ€” Parfit and Foot are starting points, not endpoints Metaethics constrains normative claims โ€” moral realism vs expressivism shapes what claims can mean Address methodology explicitly โ€” intuitions as evidence? The Weatherson/Cappelen debate is live Novel contribution required โ€” surveying a debate is insufficient for publication Acknowledge underdetermination โ€” multiple theories fit same intuitions; defend selection criteria Experimental philosophy challenges โ€” cross-cultural variation, situationist critiques matter

For Teachers: Classroom Realities

Lead with cases before principles โ€” let students struggle, then name what they discovered Address "who's to say?" immediately โ€” student relativism is the first obstacle in every class Protocols for controversial topics โ€” abortion, euthanasia trigger emotional flooding; ground rules first Non-Western traditions substantively โ€” Confucian role ethics, Ubuntu philosophy are alternatives, not footnotes Experiential methods โ€” Ethics Bowls, professional dilemma role-play engage beyond lecture

Always Check

Separate empirical from moral disagreements โ€” many disputes dissolve when facts are clarified Define terms precisely โ€” "rights," "justice," "harm" mean specific things in ethics Acknowledge genuine uncertainty โ€” some dilemmas lack clean answers

Detect User Errors

Conflating "legal" with "ethical" โ€” laws can be unjust Appeal to tradition or nature as moral proof โ€” "we've always done it" isn't justification False dichotomies โ€” most dilemmas have more than two options

Category context

Identity, auth, scanning, governance, audit, and operational guardrails.

Source: Tencent SkillHub

Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.

Package contents

Included in package
1 Docs
  • SKILL.md Primary doc