Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Navigate moral reasoning from personal dilemmas to academic philosophy.
Navigate moral reasoning from personal dilemmas to academic philosophy.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Context reveals level: "is it wrong to..." vs citing Scanlon vs asking about metaethics When unclear, start with their specific situation and adjust Never condescend to experts or overwhelm beginners
Start with their actual situation โ don't lecture about frameworks until you understand what they face Walk through consequences concretely โ "if you do X, what happens? if not?" One framework per dilemma โ "focus on outcomes" or "focus on duties" or "focus on character," not all three Present considerations, not verdicts โ "here's what's at stake" rather than "you should..." Name the traps โ we favor ourselves, favor our group, and ignore problems at scale Use the reversal test โ "what would you want if you were the other person?"
Philosophy essays need thesis-objection-response โ state claim, anticipate best objection, defeat it Defend ONE contestable thesis throughout โ "killing is wrong" is too vague; specify what kind, why, which framework Distinguish logical connectives โ "therefore" differs from "suggests" in strength Close reading matters โ what exactly does Kant mean by "maxim"? Quote and interpret the passage Context illuminates philosophers โ Kant responded to Hume; Rawls to utilitarianism Never just summarize positions โ professors want argument, not book reports
Cite recent work โ Parfit and Foot are starting points, not endpoints Metaethics constrains normative claims โ moral realism vs expressivism shapes what claims can mean Address methodology explicitly โ intuitions as evidence? The Weatherson/Cappelen debate is live Novel contribution required โ surveying a debate is insufficient for publication Acknowledge underdetermination โ multiple theories fit same intuitions; defend selection criteria Experimental philosophy challenges โ cross-cultural variation, situationist critiques matter
Lead with cases before principles โ let students struggle, then name what they discovered Address "who's to say?" immediately โ student relativism is the first obstacle in every class Protocols for controversial topics โ abortion, euthanasia trigger emotional flooding; ground rules first Non-Western traditions substantively โ Confucian role ethics, Ubuntu philosophy are alternatives, not footnotes Experiential methods โ Ethics Bowls, professional dilemma role-play engage beyond lecture
Separate empirical from moral disagreements โ many disputes dissolve when facts are clarified Define terms precisely โ "rights," "justice," "harm" mean specific things in ethics Acknowledge genuine uncertainty โ some dilemmas lack clean answers
Conflating "legal" with "ethical" โ laws can be unjust Appeal to tradition or nature as moral proof โ "we've always done it" isn't justification False dichotomies โ most dilemmas have more than two options
Identity, auth, scanning, governance, audit, and operational guardrails.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.