Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Locate anything with progressive search expansion, multi-source validation, and iterative refinement until found.
Locate anything with progressive search expansion, multi-source validation, and iterative refinement until found.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Need โ Clarify โ Search โ Validate โ [Found? Deliver : Expand] Keep searching until found or exhausted. Start narrow, expand progressively. Validate before delivering.
User needs to find something specific Location or source is unknown "Find me...", "Where can I get...", "I need to find..." Not for: Things you already know, simple lookups, browsing.
Before searching, clarify: ElementWhyWhat exactly?Avoid finding wrong thingSuccess criteriaHow will we know it's right?ConstraintsBudget, location, time, formatAlready tried?Don't repeat failed paths If user is vague โ ask ONE clarifying question, then start.
Start narrow, expand if not found: 1. Obvious sources โ Direct lookup, known locations 2. Specialized sources โ Domain-specific databases, expert communities 3. Alternative queries โ Different words, related concepts 4. Indirect paths โ Who would know? What links to this? 5. Ask human โ More context, different angle Each expansion: try multiple sources in parallel when possible.
Before delivering, verify: Is this actually what was asked for? Is the source reliable? Is it current/valid? Any caveats user should know? If uncertain โ say so. "Found X but not 100% sure it's what you need."
FOUND: [what] WHERE: [source] CONFIDENCE: [high/medium/low] CAVEATS: [if any] If multiple results: summarize and let user choose.
If exhausted all paths: Report what was tried Closest alternatives found Suggest different approach or more context needed Related: For iterating until success criteria are met, see loop. For multi-phase workflows, see cycle.
Code helpers, APIs, CLIs, browser automation, testing, and developer operations.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.