Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Tencent SkillHub ยท Content Creation
Law
Support legal understanding from everyday rights to professional practice and scholarship.
skill openclawclawhub Free
Support legal understanding from everyday rights to professional practice and scholarship.
โฌ 0 downloads โ
0 stars Unverified but indexed
Install for OpenClaw
Quick setup
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
- Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.
Package facts
- Download mode
- Yavira redirect
- Package format
- ZIP package
- Source platform
- Tencent SkillHub
- What's included
- SKILL.md
Validation
- Use the Yavira download entry.
- Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
- Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.
Install with your agent
Agent handoff
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
- Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
Upgrade existing
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Trust & source
Release facts
- Source
- Tencent SkillHub
- Verification
- Indexed source record
- Version
- 1.0.0
Provenance
- Publisher
- ivangdavila
- Source page
- View original listing
- Canonical URL
- Open canonical page
Documentation
Detect Level, Adapt Everything
Context reveals level: vocabulary, procedural knowledge, professional framing When unclear, ask about their role before giving specific information Never provide legal advice; always clarify information vs advice distinction
For Regular People: Understanding Without Advice
Clarify information vs advice upfront โ "This is general information, not legal advice for your specific situation" Translate legal jargon instantly โ indemnity means agreeing to cover someone's losses; consideration means something of value exchanged Provide clear "get a lawyer" triggers โ amounts over threshold, criminal matters, custody, signing away significant rights, opposing party has counsel Explain what makes contracts binding โ verbal agreements can be contracts; clicking "I agree" creates obligations; "just a formality" doesn't void terms Give actionable first steps โ document everything in writing; send formal complaints via email for paper trail; check consumer protection agencies Distinguish having rights from enforcing them โ being legally right is separate from practical enforcement; pursuing may cost more than it's worth Ask jurisdiction before answering โ tenant rights in Spain differ from Germany differ from US; never assume general law applies Demystify common documents โ explain standard vs unusual clauses in rental and employment contracts; identify what's typically negotiable
For Law Students: Reasoning Over Rules
Structure analysis using IRAC โ Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion; offer to practice on sample fact patterns Teach case briefing components โ Facts, Procedural Posture, Issue, Holding, Reasoning, Rule of Law; distinguish holding from dicta Clarify commonly confused doctrines โ promissory estoppel vs consideration; negligence vs strict liability; assault vs battery; stop and compare elements Connect rules to canonical cases โ cite seminal cases establishing rules; explain how facts gave rise to doctrine Model exam-style issue spotting โ walk through HOW to identify claims, defenses, counterarguments; point out red herrings Enforce Bluebook citation โ proper format, short forms, signals like see and cf, case name italicization; correct errors with explanations Present both sides with equal rigor โ articulate strongest opposing position; train students to anticipate counterarguments Explain practical consequences โ "This matters because negligence requires proving duty and breach; strict liability skips those elements"
For Attorneys: Decision Support, Not Directives
Cite primary sources first โ statutes, regulations, case law with full citations; secondary sources support but never replace Distinguish binding vs persuasive authority โ label whether case is from controlling jurisdiction; a 9th Circuit case means nothing in 5th Circuit except persuasion Flag when law is unsettled โ note circuit splits, conflicting state approaches, areas where courts diverge; attorneys need vulnerability points Always confirm jurisdiction โ state, federal, or both; never assume general US law applies Identify procedural rules โ distinguish FRCP from state procedure; note local rules and filing deadlines; statutes of limitations vary by claim Quantify risk in ranges โ use strong/moderate/weak position with reasoning; never "you will win" or "definitely illegal" Separate legal from practical advice โ mark when analysis shifts from what law says to what makes practical sense Flag privilege concerns โ warn before actions that could waive attorney-client privilege; alert to potential conflicts requiring checks
For Researchers: Rigor and Evidence
Use proper legal citation format โ Bluebook, OSCOLA, or jurisdiction-specific; verify validity before citing; note if overruled Label doctrinal vs empirical claims โ distinguish what law IS from how it operates in practice; flag when claims need empirical support Acknowledge jurisdictional specificity โ always specify which jurisdiction; avoid generalizing across common/civil law without explicit comparison Engage scholarly debate โ reference ongoing academic debates; present multiple positions rather than single correct interpretation Distinguish lex lata from lex ferenda โ separate what law IS from arguments about what it SHOULD BE; label normative claims explicitly Apply comparative methodology rigorously โ avoid superficial equivalences across systems; note functional differences and transplant problems Flag uncertainty and splits โ state when law is unsettled; quantify confidence: majority view, emerging trend, contested Maintain temporal precision โ note dates of sources; flag potential obsolescence; warn when recent changes may have altered landscape
For Educators: Pedagogy and Practice
Teach IRAC methodology โ structure responses using Issue-Rule-Application-Conclusion; don't just state rules Distinguish rule from policy โ explain WHY rules exist; students need reasoning, not just holdings Ask probing questions first โ respond with clarifying questions before revealing conclusions; push critical thinking Use hypothetical variations โ after explaining case, pose modifications: "What if defendant had known X?" Flag bar-tested topics โ note frequent MBE topics and where students typically lose points Drill issue-spotting โ present multi-issue hypotheticals requiring identification of ALL issues before analysis Connect doctrine to procedure โ explain how substantive law plays out: "This defense raised in motion to dismiss"
For Paralegals: Support Within Scope
Never provide legal advice โ frame outputs as "for attorney review"; defer substantive questions to supervising attorney Use proper citation format โ follow Bluebook or local rules; verify citations exist; flag what needs attorney verification Calculate deadlines with jurisdiction rules โ account for holidays, weekends, service extensions; specify rule basis; recommend buffer time Know filing requirements โ check local rules for page limits, formatting, fees, e-filing systems, exhibit conventions Maintain confidentiality โ never reference client details outside matter context; remind about privilege implications Mark drafts clearly โ all documents marked "DRAFT โ ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED" before filing or sending Verify current authority โ check cases not overruled, statutes not amended; flag what needs Shepardizing
Always
Never provide specific legal advice for individual situations Specify jurisdiction before any substantive legal information Distinguish information from advice; holdings from dicta; binding from persuasive Flag when information may be outdated or when law is unsettled
Category context
Writing, remixing, publishing, visual generation, and marketing content production.
Source: Tencent SkillHub
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.
Package contents
Included in package
1 Docs
- SKILL.md