โ† All skills
Tencent SkillHub ยท Security & Compliance

Legal

Think through any legal situation like a lawyer. Issue spotting, jurisdiction, risk assessment, actionable conclusions.

skill openclawclawhub Free
0 Downloads
0 Stars
0 Installs
0 Score
High Signal

Think through any legal situation like a lawyer. Issue spotting, jurisdiction, risk assessment, actionable conclusions.

โฌ‡ 0 downloads โ˜… 0 stars Unverified but indexed

Install for OpenClaw

Quick setup
  1. Download the package from Yavira.
  2. Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
  3. Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.

Requirements

Target platform
OpenClaw
Install method
Manual import
Extraction
Extract archive
Prerequisites
OpenClaw
Primary doc
SKILL.md

Package facts

Download mode
Yavira redirect
Package format
ZIP package
Source platform
Tencent SkillHub
What's included
SKILL.md

Validation

  • Use the Yavira download entry.
  • Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
  • Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.

Install with your agent

Agent handoff

Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.

  1. Download the package from Yavira.
  2. Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
  3. Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install

I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.

Upgrade existing

I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.

Trust & source

Release facts

Source
Tencent SkillHub
Verification
Indexed source record
Version
1.0.0

Documentation

ClawHub primary doc Primary doc: SKILL.md 11 sections Open source page

Pattern

Jurisdiction โ†’ Facts โ†’ Issues โ†’ Law โ†’ Application โ†’ Risk โ†’ Action Before answering anything legal: Identify where. Establish facts. Spot all issues. Find applicable law. Apply to facts. Assess risk. Recommend action.

Before

Jurisdiction first: "Where did this happen?" โ€” laws vary dramatically Role clarity: Who am I advising? What's their goal? Disclaimer ready: "Legal information, not legal advice for your specific situation"

1. Fact Gathering

Separate facts from interpretations Ask for documents, not summaries Timeline everything โ€” sequence matters legally Note what's missing โ€” gaps change analysis

2. Issue Spotting

List ALL potential legal issues, not just the obvious one Consider both sides โ€” what could the other party claim? Check for procedural issues (deadlines, notice requirements, standing) Look for overlapping areas (contract AND tort, civil AND criminal)

3. Law Application

State the rule before applying it Distinguish: statute vs case law vs regulation Note if law is settled or unsettled in this jurisdiction Mark binding vs persuasive authority

4. Risk Assessment

Quantify: strong / moderate / weak position Consider: cost of being wrong vs cost of action Factor: enforceability, not just legality Include: reputational and relationship costs

After

One-line position: "You likely [have/don't have] a viable claim because ___" Key vulnerabilities: What could defeat this position? Action with deadline: What to do by when Escalation trigger: When this needs a licensed attorney

Traps

Jurisdiction assumption: US law โ‰  UK law โ‰  EU law Single issue focus: Missing the procedural or secondary claims Certainty theater: "You will win" โ€” law is probabilistic Advice vs information: Crossing into specific recommendations without license Outdated law: Regulations change; statutes get amended; cases get overruled Verbal over written: If it's not documented, it's harder to prove

Framework: IRAC

The standard legal reasoning structure: StepQuestionOutputIssueWhat's the legal question?One sentence framingRuleWhat law applies?Statute, case, or regulationApplicationHow does law apply to these facts?Fact-by-fact analysisConclusionWhat's the answer?Position + confidence level

Risk Matrix

FactorLower RiskHigher RiskDocumentationWritten, signed, datedVerbal, informalTimelineWithin limitsNear or past deadlinesOther partyNo lawyerHas representationAmountUnder small claimsSignificant sumComplexitySingle issue, clear factsMultiple parties, disputed facts

Output

โš–๏ธ JURISDICTION: [Location + applicable law] ๐Ÿ“‹ ISSUES: [All spotted, prioritized] ๐Ÿ“– RULE: [Applicable law, source cited] ๐Ÿ” APPLICATION: [Facts โ†’ Law analysis] โš ๏ธ RISKS: [Key vulnerabilities] โžก๏ธ ACTION: [What to do + deadline] ๐Ÿšจ ESCALATE IF: [Triggers for licensed counsel] Channels legal thinking. Works for basic questions through complex analysis.

Category context

Identity, auth, scanning, governance, audit, and operational guardrails.

Source: Tencent SkillHub

Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.

Package contents

Included in package
1 Docs
  • SKILL.md Primary doc