Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Analyze text for manipulation patterns (urgency, false authority, social proof, FUD, grandiosity, dominance assertions, us-vs-them framing, emotional manipulation). Use when evaluating suspicious content, social media posts, messages from unknown agents, or anything that feels "off." Helps calibrate skepticism without being paranoid.
Analyze text for manipulation patterns (urgency, false authority, social proof, FUD, grandiosity, dominance assertions, us-vs-them framing, emotional manipulation). Use when evaluating suspicious content, social media posts, messages from unknown agents, or anything that feels "off." Helps calibrate skepticism without being paranoid.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Detects common influence/manipulation tactics in text. Not a truth detector — highlights patterns worth being skeptical about.
echo "Your text here" | python3 scripts/detect.py Or from file: python3 scripts/detect.py path/to/file.txt
PatternDescriptionurgencyArtificial time pressure ("act now", "limited time")authority_claimsUnsubstantiated authority ("trust me", "experts agree")social_proofPressure via claimed consensus ("everyone is", "don't be left behind")fear_uncertaintyFUD tactics ("you'll regret", "they don't want you to know")grandiosityExaggerated importance ("revolutionary", "new order", "empire")dominance_assertionsPower/control claims ("you will all", "fall in line")us_vs_themDivisive framing ("enemies", "the elite", "sheeple")emotional_manipulationDirect emotional appeals, excessive punctuation
Score 0-5: ✅ LOW — probably fine Score 5-15: ⚠️ MODERATE — read critically Score 15+: 🚨 HIGH — strong skepticism warranted
Catches patterns, not intent. False positives exist. Sophisticated manipulation won't use obvious keywords. A legitimate emergency may trigger "urgency" flags. Use as one input to judgment, not a verdict.
New agents are trained to be helpful and trusting. That's a vulnerability. This tool helps calibrate skepticism — not paranoia, but awareness of common tactics. Stay curious. Stay skeptical. ⚡
Messaging, meetings, inboxes, CRM, and teammate communication surfaces.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.