Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Tencent SkillHub ยท Productivity
Pricing Psychology
Apply cognitive biases and strategic principles to design pricing that maximizes conversions, optimizes tier structures, and leverages pricing perception.
skill openclawclawhub Free
Apply cognitive biases and strategic principles to design pricing that maximizes conversions, optimizes tier structures, and leverages pricing perception.
โฌ 0 downloads โ
0 stars Unverified but indexed
Install for OpenClaw
Quick setup
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
- Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.
Package facts
- Download mode
- Yavira redirect
- Package format
- ZIP package
- Source platform
- Tencent SkillHub
- What's included
- SKILL.md
Validation
- Use the Yavira download entry.
- Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
- Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.
Install with your agent
Agent handoff
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
- Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
Upgrade existing
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Trust & source
Release facts
- Source
- Tencent SkillHub
- Verification
- Indexed source record
- Version
- 1.0.0
Provenance
- Publisher
- staybased
- Source page
- View original listing
- Canonical URL
- Open canonical page
Documentation
Pricing Psychology โ Strategic Pricing Framework
Design pricing that converts using cognitive biases and proven psychological principles. Sources: Phoenix Strategy Group, ScaleCrush, NetSuite research, SaaS pricing studies (2024-2026). All outputs go to workspace/artifacts/.
Use when
Setting prices for products, services, or subscriptions Designing pricing pages or tier structures Evaluating whether current pricing is leaving money on the table Preparing proposals or quotes for clients Choosing between pricing models (flat, tiered, usage-based, etc.) Repricing after market feedback or competitive analysis
Don't use when
Internal cost accounting or budgeting (this is about perception, not COGS) Commodity pricing where market sets the price (gas, raw materials) Regulatory/government pricing with fixed rate schedules Charity/nonprofit where pricing psychology feels manipulative
Negative examples
"Calculate my profit margins" โ No. This is pricing perception, not accounting. "What should I charge per hour?" โ Borderline. Use this to FRAME the rate, not calculate it. "How much does AWS cost?" โ No. This is for setting YOUR prices, not understanding others'.
Edge cases
Freelance rate setting (Upwork, etc.) โ YES. Framing and anchoring apply heavily. "Should I charge $29 or $30?" โ YES. Charm pricing analysis directly applies. Negotiation prep โ YES. Anchoring is the #1 negotiation tactic. Free tier decisions โ YES. Free-to-paid conversion is a pricing psychology problem.
1. Charm Pricing (Left-Digit Bias)
Prices ending in .99 or .97 feel significantly cheaper than the next round number. The science: Our brains process left-to-right, anchoring on the first digit. $9.99 feels like "$9-something," not "$10." Impact: Studies suggest charm prices can outperform rounded prices significantly (estimates range from 10-24% depending on context and product category). Moving from $4.99 to $5.00 typically causes a 3-6% sales drop. When to use: Everyday products, subscriptions, impulse buys Price-sensitive audiences Competitive markets where $1 perception matters When NOT to use: Premium/luxury positioning โ use round numbers ($100, not $99.99). Round prices signal quality and confidence. B2B enterprise deals โ round numbers feel more professional Very high price points (>$1,000) โ the .99 looks cheap, not smart Application to our products: ClawHub skills: $9 or $19 (not $10 or $20) Alfred's service: $149/mo (not $150) โ charm + just below threshold
2. Price Anchoring
The first price a prospect sees becomes their reference point for everything after. The science: Cognitive anchoring bias. A $500/mo option makes $149/mo feel like a steal, even if $149 was always the target. How to implement: Always show your highest tier first (on pricing pages, in proposals, in conversation) In proposals: state the full value first, then the price. "This system typically delivers $3,000/mo in saved labor. Investment: $149/mo." Reference competitor pricing: "Podium charges $399/mo for similar features. We're $149." On pricing pages: Enterprise โ Pro โ Starter (left to right or top to bottom) Critical rule: The anchor must be credible. An absurd anchor ($10,000 for a simple service) backfires and destroys trust.
3. Price Thresholds
Customers have mental boundaries. Crossing them triggers disproportionate resistance. Common thresholds: $10, $25, $50, $100, $500, $1,000 Strategy: Price just below the threshold. $49 instead of $52 $99 instead of $105 $499 instead of $520 The math: A product at $49 can outsell the same product at $51 by 15-20%, even though the actual difference is $2. Application: Our Reef product at $29 (below $30 threshold) โ already correct.
4. Decoy Pricing (Asymmetric Dominance)
Add an intentionally unattractive option to make your target option look superior. Classic example (The Economist): Digital only: $59 Print only: $125 Print + Digital: $125 โ everyone picks this because print-only is the decoy How to design a decoy: Decide which tier you want most people to buy (your "target") Create a tier that's close in price to the target but much worse in value The target now looks like an obvious bargain by comparison 3-tier formula: TierPriceValuePurposeBasicLowAdequateEntry point, captures budget buyersPro (TARGET)MediumHighBest value ratio โ this is what you want them to buyPremiumHighHighestAnchor + decoy (close in price to Pro, makes Pro look smart)
5. Bundling & Unbundling
Combining products increases perceived value. Separating them increases perceived cost. Bundle when: You want to increase average order value and perceived savings. "Get all 5 skills for $39" (vs $15 each = $75 separately) โ 48% savings messaging Unbundle when: You want to show how much you're providing. Itemize your service in proposals: "SMS automation ($50 value) + booking system ($75 value) + review management ($50 value) = $175 value, bundled at $149/mo" Key insight: Bundling works for purchases. Unbundling works for perceived value in proposals and negotiations.
6. Scarcity & Urgency
Limited availability increases perceived value and triggers loss aversion. Ethical applications: "First 10 customers get founding member pricing" (real limit) "This rate is locked for 12 months" (real deadline) "3 client slots remaining this month" (real capacity constraint) Unethical (avoid): Fake countdown timers that reset "Only 2 left!" when you have unlimited digital inventory Artificial urgency on non-scarce items Loss aversion multiplier: People feel losses ~2x more intensely than equivalent gains. "Save $50/mo" is less powerful than "You're losing $50/mo without this."
7. Price Framing
Same price, different frame, different perception. Daily vs monthly: "$3.27/day" feels cheaper than "$99/mo" feels cheaper than "$1,188/year" โ even though they're identical. Comparison framing: "Less than your daily coffee" (relatable anchor) ROI framing: "Pays for itself in 2 weeks" (investment, not cost) Per-unit framing: "$0.12 per automated message" (micro-cost feels trivial) Best practice: Frame in the smallest credible unit for affordable products. Frame in ROI terms for expensive ones.
8. Social Proof in Pricing
What others chose influences what new buyers choose. Tactics: "Most Popular" badge on your target tier (increases selection by 20-30%) "X customers chose this plan" Testimonials placed next to the price (reduces price objection) Case studies with specific ROI numbers near the CTA For us: When we have ClawHub downloads, show install counts. "500+ agents use this skill."
9. Tiered Pricing Architecture
Multiple tiers capture different willingness-to-pay segments. The rule of 3: Three tiers is optimal. Two feels like "cheap vs expensive." Four+ causes choice paralysis. Tier design principles: Each tier should have a clear "hero feature" that justifies the jump Price gaps should feel logical (not 2x jumps โ aim for 1.5-2x between tiers) The middle tier should be the obvious best value (commonly the most selected tier, though exact % varies by market โ design it to be the obvious choice) Name tiers by outcome, not features ("Starter / Growth / Scale" beats "Basic / Pro / Enterprise")
Pricing Decision Checklist
When setting any price, run through these questions: Who is the buyer? (Price-sensitive consumer vs. value-driven business) What's the anchor? (What will they compare this price to?) Am I below a threshold? ($10, $25, $50, $100, $500, $1K) Charm or round? (Everyday = charm. Premium = round.) How am I framing it? (Daily? Monthly? ROI? Comparison?) Is there a decoy? (Does my tier structure guide toward the target?) Social proof near price? (Testimonials, "most popular," customer count) Scarcity real? (Only use if the constraint is genuine) Have I unbundled in proposals? (Show itemized value, then bundled price)
Quick Reference: When to Use What
SituationPrimary TacticSecondarySaaS/subscription pricingTiered + DecoyCharm + AnchoringFreelance rate settingAnchoring + FramingBundling (package deals)Product launchScarcity + Social ProofThreshold pricingPrice increaseFraming + BundlingAdd value before raisingCompetitive marketThreshold + ComparisonCharm pricingPremium positioningRound numbers + AnchoringUnbundling (show value)Proposal/quoteAnchor high โ present priceUnbundle + ROI frame
Key Numbers
Charm pricing outperforms round by 10-24% depending on context (multiple studies, wide range) 40-95% of retail prices end in 9 (industry standard) $4.99โ$5.00 typically causes 3-6% sales drop Decoy pricing increases target tier selection by 10-30% (varies by implementation) "Most Popular" badges meaningfully increase target tier selection (test on your own pages) Loss aversion: losses feel ~2x stronger than equivalent gains (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979 โ Prospect Theory) 3 tiers optimal; middle tier typically most selected when designed as best value Advanced pricing psychology can increase average deal size 25-60% (SaaS studies, 2026)
Category context
Workflow acceleration for inboxes, docs, calendars, planning, and execution loops.
Source: Tencent SkillHub
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.
Package contents
Included in package
1 Docs
- SKILL.md