{ "schemaVersion": "1.0", "item": { "slug": "pubmed", "name": "PubMed", "source": "tencent", "type": "skill", "category": "开发工具", "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/ivangdavila/pubmed", "canonicalUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/ivangdavila/pubmed", "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw" }, "install": { "downloadMode": "redirect", "downloadUrl": "/downloads/pubmed", "sourceDownloadUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=pubmed", "sourcePlatform": "tencent", "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw", "installMethod": "Manual import", "extraction": "Extract archive", "prerequisites": [ "OpenClaw" ], "packageFormat": "ZIP package", "includedAssets": [ "SKILL.md" ], "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md", "quickSetup": [ "Download the package from Yavira.", "Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.", "Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup." ], "agentAssist": { "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.", "steps": [ "Download the package from Yavira.", "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.", "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder." ], "prompts": [ { "label": "New install", "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete." }, { "label": "Upgrade existing", "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run." } ] }, "sourceHealth": { "source": "tencent", "status": "healthy", "reason": "direct_download_ok", "recommendedAction": "download", "checkedAt": "2026-04-30T16:55:25.780Z", "expiresAt": "2026-05-07T16:55:25.780Z", "httpStatus": 200, "finalUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=network", "contentType": "application/zip", "probeMethod": "head", "details": { "probeUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=network", "contentDisposition": "attachment; filename=\"network-1.0.0.zip\"", "redirectLocation": null, "bodySnippet": null }, "scope": "source", "summary": "Source download looks usable.", "detail": "Yavira can redirect you to the upstream package for this source.", "primaryActionLabel": "Download for OpenClaw", "primaryActionHref": "/downloads/pubmed" }, "validation": { "installChecklist": [ "Use the Yavira download entry.", "Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.", "Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets." ], "postInstallChecks": [ "Confirm the extracted package includes the expected docs or setup files.", "Validate the skill or prompts are available in your target agent workspace.", "Capture any manual follow-up steps the agent could not complete." ] }, "downloadPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/pubmed", "agentPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/pubmed/agent", "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/pubmed/agent.json", "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/pubmed/agent.md" }, "agentAssist": { "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.", "steps": [ "Download the package from Yavira.", "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.", "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder." ], "prompts": [ { "label": "New install", "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete." }, { "label": "Upgrade existing", "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run." } ] }, "documentation": { "source": "clawhub", "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md", "sections": [ { "title": "Query Construction", "body": "Use MeSH terms for precise searching — controlled vocabulary ensures you find related concepts regardless of wording\nBoolean operators must be uppercase: AND, OR, NOT — lowercase is ignored\nPhrase searching with quotes: \"heart failure\" not heart failure — unquoted searches terms separately\nField tags narrow searches: [Title], [Author], [MeSH Terms] — example: aspirin[Title] AND prevention[MeSH]\nTruncation with asterisk: therap* finds therapy, therapies, therapeutic" }, { "title": "Essential Filters", "body": "Article type matters: Clinical Trial, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis — filter by study design\nPublication date for recent evidence — older studies may be superseded\nFree full text filter if access is limited — but don't ignore paywalled high-quality studies\nHumans filter excludes animal studies — relevant for clinical questions\nLanguage filter if translation isn't feasible" }, { "title": "Study Hierarchy", "body": "Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize multiple studies — start here for established topics\nRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are gold standard for interventions — but not all questions are answerable by RCT\nCohort studies for long-term outcomes and rare exposures\nCase-control for rare diseases\nCase reports are lowest evidence — interesting but not generalizable\nGuidelines synthesize evidence into recommendations — check who wrote them and when" }, { "title": "Critical Appraisal", "body": "Sample size matters — small studies may show effects that don't replicate\nCheck confidence intervals, not just p-values — narrow CI with meaningful effect size beats p<0.05\nFunding source and conflicts of interest affect interpretation — industry-funded studies favor sponsors\nPrimary vs secondary outcomes — cherry-picking significant secondary outcomes is common\nIntention-to-treat vs per-protocol analysis — ITT is more conservative and realistic" }, { "title": "Common Traps", "body": "Abstract conclusions may oversell results — read methods and results sections\nSingle studies rarely settle questions — look for replication and systematic reviews\nStatistical significance isn't clinical significance — 1% improvement may not matter to patients\nRetracted papers still appear in searches — check Retraction Watch for controversial papers\nPredatory journals publish low-quality research — verify journal reputation\nPreprints haven't been peer-reviewed — useful for speed but not vetted" }, { "title": "Search Strategy", "body": "PICO framework: Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome — structures clinical questions\nStart broad, then narrow with filters — missing relevant papers worse than sorting through extras\nSave searches for ongoing monitoring — PubMed can email when new papers match\nRelated Articles feature finds similar papers — useful after finding one good paper\nCitation tracking: who cited this paper? — follow research forward in time" }, { "title": "Evaluating Sources", "body": "Impact factor indicates journal prestige, not individual paper quality\nFirst and last authors typically did the work and led the project\nCorresponding author handles questions — contact for clarifications\nCheck author affiliations — institutional reputation matters\nMethods section determines if results are trustworthy — results are only as good as methods" }, { "title": "For Specific Questions", "body": "Treatment efficacy: RCTs and systematic reviews first\nDiagnosis accuracy: sensitivity/specificity studies\nPrognosis: cohort studies with long follow-up\nEtiology/harm: cohort or case-control studies\nPrevention: RCTs when available, cohort otherwise" }, { "title": "Practical Tips", "body": "PubMed is free but full text often isn't — check institutional access, Unpaywall, or request from authors\nPMID is the unique identifier — use it for precise citations\nExport to reference manager (EndNote, Zotero) — manual citation is error-prone\nClinical Queries filter pre-filters for clinical relevance — therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, etiology\nSimilar Articles and Cited By expand discovery — algorithm finds related work" }, { "title": "Red Flags in Papers", "body": "No control group for intervention studies\nConclusions not supported by data presented\nMissing or inadequate statistical analysis\nSelective reporting of outcomes\nConflicts of interest not disclosed\nExtraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence" } ], "body": "PubMed Research Rules\nQuery Construction\nUse MeSH terms for precise searching — controlled vocabulary ensures you find related concepts regardless of wording\nBoolean operators must be uppercase: AND, OR, NOT — lowercase is ignored\nPhrase searching with quotes: \"heart failure\" not heart failure — unquoted searches terms separately\nField tags narrow searches: [Title], [Author], [MeSH Terms] — example: aspirin[Title] AND prevention[MeSH]\nTruncation with asterisk: therap* finds therapy, therapies, therapeutic\nEssential Filters\nArticle type matters: Clinical Trial, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis — filter by study design\nPublication date for recent evidence — older studies may be superseded\nFree full text filter if access is limited — but don't ignore paywalled high-quality studies\nHumans filter excludes animal studies — relevant for clinical questions\nLanguage filter if translation isn't feasible\nStudy Hierarchy\nSystematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize multiple studies — start here for established topics\nRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are gold standard for interventions — but not all questions are answerable by RCT\nCohort studies for long-term outcomes and rare exposures\nCase-control for rare diseases\nCase reports are lowest evidence — interesting but not generalizable\nGuidelines synthesize evidence into recommendations — check who wrote them and when\nCritical Appraisal\nSample size matters — small studies may show effects that don't replicate\nCheck confidence intervals, not just p-values — narrow CI with meaningful effect size beats p<0.05\nFunding source and conflicts of interest affect interpretation — industry-funded studies favor sponsors\nPrimary vs secondary outcomes — cherry-picking significant secondary outcomes is common\nIntention-to-treat vs per-protocol analysis — ITT is more conservative and realistic\nCommon Traps\nAbstract conclusions may oversell results — read methods and results sections\nSingle studies rarely settle questions — look for replication and systematic reviews\nStatistical significance isn't clinical significance — 1% improvement may not matter to patients\nRetracted papers still appear in searches — check Retraction Watch for controversial papers\nPredatory journals publish low-quality research — verify journal reputation\nPreprints haven't been peer-reviewed — useful for speed but not vetted\nSearch Strategy\nPICO framework: Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome — structures clinical questions\nStart broad, then narrow with filters — missing relevant papers worse than sorting through extras\nSave searches for ongoing monitoring — PubMed can email when new papers match\nRelated Articles feature finds similar papers — useful after finding one good paper\nCitation tracking: who cited this paper? — follow research forward in time\nEvaluating Sources\nImpact factor indicates journal prestige, not individual paper quality\nFirst and last authors typically did the work and led the project\nCorresponding author handles questions — contact for clarifications\nCheck author affiliations — institutional reputation matters\nMethods section determines if results are trustworthy — results are only as good as methods\nFor Specific Questions\nTreatment efficacy: RCTs and systematic reviews first\nDiagnosis accuracy: sensitivity/specificity studies\nPrognosis: cohort studies with long follow-up\nEtiology/harm: cohort or case-control studies\nPrevention: RCTs when available, cohort otherwise\nPractical Tips\nPubMed is free but full text often isn't — check institutional access, Unpaywall, or request from authors\nPMID is the unique identifier — use it for precise citations\nExport to reference manager (EndNote, Zotero) — manual citation is error-prone\nClinical Queries filter pre-filters for clinical relevance — therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, etiology\nSimilar Articles and Cited By expand discovery — algorithm finds related work\nRed Flags in Papers\nNo control group for intervention studies\nConclusions not supported by data presented\nMissing or inadequate statistical analysis\nSelective reporting of outcomes\nConflicts of interest not disclosed\nExtraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence" }, "trust": { "sourceLabel": "tencent", "provenanceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/ivangdavila/pubmed", "publisherUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/ivangdavila/pubmed", "owner": "ivangdavila", "version": "1.0.0", "license": null, "verificationStatus": "Indexed source record" }, "links": { "detailUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/pubmed", "downloadUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/pubmed", "agentUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/pubmed/agent", "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/pubmed/agent.json", "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/pubmed/agent.md" } }