Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Create high-quality pull requests with pre-submission validation, maintainer-friendly formatting, and automated quality checks.
Create high-quality pull requests with pre-submission validation, maintainer-friendly formatting, and automated quality checks.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Before creating or suggesting a pull request to ANY repository. Acts as a quality filter to prevent wasting maintainer time and embarrassing the contributor.
DomainFilePre-submission checklistchecklist.mdRed flags to avoidred-flags.mdRepository context gatheringrepo-context.mdPR description templatestemplates.md
Read CONTRIBUTING.md first โ Adapt to project's workflow, not a fixed pattern Issue policy depends on scope โ Small fixes may PR directly; features need discussion first Disclose AI involvement โ Mark AI-assisted PRs in title/description Run checks if possible โ If you can't run tests, say so explicitly Match existing style โ Check for .editorconfig, prettier, eslint configs Small and focused โ One logical change per PR No secrets ever โ Use <PLACEHOLDER> syntax
NOT all projects require issues first. Check CONTRIBUTING.md, then: Change TypeDefault ActionTypo, small bug fixPR directly (unless CONTRIBUTING.md says otherwise)New featureOpen Discussion/Issue first, wait for approvalArchitecture changeRFC or Discussion requiredWhen in doubtAsk in issue before coding
If this PR was created with AI assistance: Mark it โ Add [AI-assisted] to PR title or note in description Testing level โ State: untested / lightly tested / fully tested Include context โ Prompts or session logs if available and helpful Confirm understanding โ "I have reviewed this code and understand what it does" Human accountable โ Link to the human directing the contribution
MAX 1 open PR per repo at a time Wait 24h between PRs to same repo If 2 PRs rejected consecutively โ STOP and escalate to human Check repo's PR velocity first (don't flood low-activity projects)
MUST respond to review feedback within 48h If unable to address feedback, close with: "I cannot continue; @human please take over or close" Never leave PRs to rot
Change touches >5 files OR >200 lines Change modifies public API Change involves security, auth, or crypto Change is in governance, licensing, or CoC Maintainer requested discussion in issue You're unsure if this aligns with project philosophy
Escalate to human when: Reviewer asks clarifying questions about design intent CI fails in non-obvious way Any pushback beyond "fix this typo" Reviewer seems confused or frustrated You can't run the test suite locally
Code helpers, APIs, CLIs, browser automation, testing, and developer operations.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.