Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Academic paper quality filtering agent with rigorous scoring system and comprehensive audit trail. Filters papers based on relevance and quality criteria for...
Academic paper quality filtering agent with rigorous scoring system and comprehensive audit trail. Filters papers based on relevance and quality criteria for...
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
This skill provides systematic quality filtering for academic papers with a rigorous scoring system and complete audit trail for research workflows.
Relevance Scoring: Evaluates paper relevance based on title and abstract keywords Quality Assessment: Assesses technical quality and experimental rigor Comprehensive Logging: Maintains detailed records of all filtering decisions Manual Recall Support: Preserves filtered papers for potential human review Local File Storage: Saves all results to organized directory structure
Strong Match (+3): Title contains "music" or "song" keywords Medium Match (+2): Title contains "audio" + "generation" Weak Match (+1): Title has weak but related keywords Negative Scoring: Abstract verification can subtract points (-1 to -3)
High Quality (+3): Complete experiments, multiple baselines, strong results Medium Quality (+2): Experiments present but limited baseline comparison Low Quality (+1): Limited technical contribution or incomplete evaluation
Minimum Score: 6/10 points required to pass filtering Strong Relevance Override: Papers with clear "music/song generation" focus may pass with lower scores
This skill integrates with the broader research workflow: Input: Raw paper list from arXiv search Processing: Applies scoring system to each paper Output: Categorizes papers as "passed" or "filtered" Audit Trail: Maintains complete record for manual recall
Main Log: research/{domain}/quality_filtering/quality_filtering_log.md Append Mode: All results appended to single comprehensive file Directory Structure: Automatically created if missing
Each filtering session includes: Session Header: Date, domain, search parameters Scoring Standards: Detailed criteria used Individual Paper Results: Title, authors, score breakdown, decision Summary Statistics: Pass/fail counts, score distribution Manual Recall Section: List of filtered papers available for human review
# Filter music generation papers quality_filter --domain "music_generation" --papers "[paper_list]" --date "2026-02-28" # Filter with custom threshold quality_filter --domain "speech_audio" --threshold 5 --papers "[paper_list]"
research/{domain}/quality_filtering/quality_filtering_log.md (append mode) Directory structure automatically created if missing
All filtering decisions must include: Complete score breakdown (relevance + quality components) Clear pass/fail rationale Preservation of filtered papers for manual recall Timestamp and session context
Code helpers, APIs, CLIs, browser automation, testing, and developer operations.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.