{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "item": {
    "slug": "subagent-driven-development",
    "name": "Subagent Driven Development",
    "source": "tencent",
    "type": "skill",
    "category": "效率提升",
    "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zlc000190/subagent-driven-development",
    "canonicalUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zlc000190/subagent-driven-development",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw"
  },
  "install": {
    "downloadMode": "redirect",
    "downloadUrl": "/downloads/subagent-driven-development",
    "sourceDownloadUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=subagent-driven-development",
    "sourcePlatform": "tencent",
    "targetPlatform": "OpenClaw",
    "installMethod": "Manual import",
    "extraction": "Extract archive",
    "prerequisites": [
      "OpenClaw"
    ],
    "packageFormat": "ZIP package",
    "includedAssets": [
      "SKILL.md",
      "code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md",
      "implementer-prompt.md",
      "spec-reviewer-prompt.md"
    ],
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "quickSetup": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.",
      "Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup."
    ],
    "agentAssist": {
      "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
      "steps": [
        "Download the package from Yavira.",
        "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
        "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
      ],
      "prompts": [
        {
          "label": "New install",
          "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
        },
        {
          "label": "Upgrade existing",
          "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
        }
      ]
    },
    "sourceHealth": {
      "source": "tencent",
      "status": "healthy",
      "reason": "direct_download_ok",
      "recommendedAction": "download",
      "checkedAt": "2026-04-30T16:55:25.780Z",
      "expiresAt": "2026-05-07T16:55:25.780Z",
      "httpStatus": 200,
      "finalUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=network",
      "contentType": "application/zip",
      "probeMethod": "head",
      "details": {
        "probeUrl": "https://wry-manatee-359.convex.site/api/v1/download?slug=network",
        "contentDisposition": "attachment; filename=\"network-1.0.0.zip\"",
        "redirectLocation": null,
        "bodySnippet": null
      },
      "scope": "source",
      "summary": "Source download looks usable.",
      "detail": "Yavira can redirect you to the upstream package for this source.",
      "primaryActionLabel": "Download for OpenClaw",
      "primaryActionHref": "/downloads/subagent-driven-development"
    },
    "validation": {
      "installChecklist": [
        "Use the Yavira download entry.",
        "Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.",
        "Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets."
      ],
      "postInstallChecks": [
        "Confirm the extracted package includes the expected docs or setup files.",
        "Validate the skill or prompts are available in your target agent workspace.",
        "Capture any manual follow-up steps the agent could not complete."
      ]
    },
    "downloadPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/subagent-driven-development",
    "agentPageUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/subagent-driven-development/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/subagent-driven-development/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/subagent-driven-development/agent.md"
  },
  "agentAssist": {
    "summary": "Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.",
    "steps": [
      "Download the package from Yavira.",
      "Extract it into a folder your agent can access.",
      "Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder."
    ],
    "prompts": [
      {
        "label": "New install",
        "body": "I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete."
      },
      {
        "label": "Upgrade existing",
        "body": "I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run."
      }
    ]
  },
  "documentation": {
    "source": "clawhub",
    "primaryDoc": "SKILL.md",
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "Subagent-Driven Development",
        "body": "Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\nCore principle: Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration"
      },
      {
        "title": "When to Use",
        "body": "digraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n\nvs. Executing Plans (parallel session):\n\nSame session (no context switch)\nFresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\nTwo-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\nFaster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)"
      },
      {
        "title": "The Process",
        "body": "digraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}"
      },
      {
        "title": "Prompt Templates",
        "body": "./implementer-prompt.md - Dispatch implementer subagent\n./spec-reviewer-prompt.md - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent"
      },
      {
        "title": "Example Workflow",
        "body": "You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs/plans/feature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~/.config/superpowers/hooks/)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5/5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify/repair modes\n  - 8/8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!"
      },
      {
        "title": "Advantages",
        "body": "vs. Manual execution:\n\nSubagents follow TDD naturally\nFresh context per task (no confusion)\nParallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\nSubagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\nvs. Executing Plans:\n\nSame session (no handoff)\nContinuous progress (no waiting)\nReview checkpoints automatic\n\nEfficiency gains:\n\nNo file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\nController curates exactly what context is needed\nSubagent gets complete information upfront\nQuestions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\nQuality gates:\n\nSelf-review catches issues before handoff\nTwo-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\nReview loops ensure fixes actually work\nSpec compliance prevents over/under-building\nCode quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\nCost:\n\nMore subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\nController does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\nReview loops add iterations\nBut catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)"
      },
      {
        "title": "Red Flags",
        "body": "Never:\n\nStart implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent\nSkip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\nProceed with unfixed issues\nDispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\nMake subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\nSkip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\nIgnore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\nAccept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\nSkip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\nLet implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\nStart code quality review before spec compliance is ✅ (wrong order)\nMove to next task while either review has open issues\n\nIf subagent asks questions:\n\nAnswer clearly and completely\nProvide additional context if needed\nDon't rush them into implementation\n\nIf reviewer finds issues:\n\nImplementer (same subagent) fixes them\nReviewer reviews again\nRepeat until approved\nDon't skip the re-review\n\nIf subagent fails task:\n\nDispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\nDon't try to fix manually (context pollution)"
      },
      {
        "title": "Integration",
        "body": "Required workflow skills:\n\nsuperpowers:using-git-worktrees - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting\nsuperpowers:writing-plans - Creates the plan this skill executes\nsuperpowers:requesting-code-review - Code review template for reviewer subagents\nsuperpowers:finishing-a-development-branch - Complete development after all tasks\n\nSubagents should use:\n\nsuperpowers:test-driven-development - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\nAlternative workflow:\n\nsuperpowers:executing-plans - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution"
      }
    ],
    "body": "Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\nCore principle: Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\nWhen to Use\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n\n\nvs. Executing Plans (parallel session):\n\nSame session (no context switch)\nFresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\nTwo-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\nFaster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\nThe Process\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n\nPrompt Templates\n./implementer-prompt.md - Dispatch implementer subagent\n./spec-reviewer-prompt.md - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\nExample Workflow\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs/plans/feature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~/.config/superpowers/hooks/)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5/5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify/repair modes\n  - 8/8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n\nAdvantages\n\nvs. Manual execution:\n\nSubagents follow TDD naturally\nFresh context per task (no confusion)\nParallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\nSubagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\nvs. Executing Plans:\n\nSame session (no handoff)\nContinuous progress (no waiting)\nReview checkpoints automatic\n\nEfficiency gains:\n\nNo file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\nController curates exactly what context is needed\nSubagent gets complete information upfront\nQuestions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\nQuality gates:\n\nSelf-review catches issues before handoff\nTwo-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\nReview loops ensure fixes actually work\nSpec compliance prevents over/under-building\nCode quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\nCost:\n\nMore subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\nController does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\nReview loops add iterations\nBut catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\nRed Flags\n\nNever:\n\nStart implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent\nSkip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\nProceed with unfixed issues\nDispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\nMake subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\nSkip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\nIgnore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\nAccept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\nSkip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\nLet implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\nStart code quality review before spec compliance is ✅ (wrong order)\nMove to next task while either review has open issues\n\nIf subagent asks questions:\n\nAnswer clearly and completely\nProvide additional context if needed\nDon't rush them into implementation\n\nIf reviewer finds issues:\n\nImplementer (same subagent) fixes them\nReviewer reviews again\nRepeat until approved\nDon't skip the re-review\n\nIf subagent fails task:\n\nDispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\nDon't try to fix manually (context pollution)\nIntegration\n\nRequired workflow skills:\n\nsuperpowers:using-git-worktrees - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting\nsuperpowers:writing-plans - Creates the plan this skill executes\nsuperpowers:requesting-code-review - Code review template for reviewer subagents\nsuperpowers:finishing-a-development-branch - Complete development after all tasks\n\nSubagents should use:\n\nsuperpowers:test-driven-development - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\nAlternative workflow:\n\nsuperpowers:executing-plans - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution"
  },
  "trust": {
    "sourceLabel": "tencent",
    "provenanceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zlc000190/subagent-driven-development",
    "publisherUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zlc000190/subagent-driven-development",
    "owner": "zlc000190",
    "version": "0.1.0",
    "license": null,
    "verificationStatus": "Indexed source record"
  },
  "links": {
    "detailUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/subagent-driven-development",
    "downloadUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/downloads/subagent-driven-development",
    "agentUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/subagent-driven-development/agent",
    "manifestUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/subagent-driven-development/agent.json",
    "briefUrl": "https://openagent3.xyz/skills/subagent-driven-development/agent.md"
  }
}