← All skills
Tencent SkillHub · Data Analysis

Sui Coverage

Analyze Sui Move test coverage, identify untested code, write missing tests, and perform security audits. Includes Python tools for parsing coverage output and generating reports.

skill openclawclawhub Free
0 Downloads
0 Stars
0 Installs
0 Score
High Signal

Analyze Sui Move test coverage, identify untested code, write missing tests, and perform security audits. Includes Python tools for parsing coverage output and generating reports.

⬇ 0 downloads ★ 0 stars Unverified but indexed

Install for OpenClaw

Quick setup
  1. Download the package from Yavira.
  2. Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
  3. Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.

Requirements

Target platform
OpenClaw
Install method
Manual import
Extraction
Extract archive
Prerequisites
OpenClaw
Primary doc
SKILL.md

Package facts

Download mode
Yavira redirect
Package format
ZIP package
Source platform
Tencent SkillHub
What's included
SKILL.md, analyze.py, analyze_source.py, parse_bytecode.py, parse_source.py

Validation

  • Use the Yavira download entry.
  • Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
  • Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.

Install with your agent

Agent handoff

Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.

  1. Download the package from Yavira.
  2. Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
  3. Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install

I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.

Upgrade existing

I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.

Trust & source

Release facts

Source
Tencent SkillHub
Verification
Indexed source record
Version
1.1.1

Documentation

ClawHub primary doc Primary doc: SKILL.md 26 sections Open source page

Sui Coverage Skill

Analyze and automatically improve Sui Move test coverage with security analysis. GitHub: https://github.com/EasonC13-agent/sui-skills/tree/main/sui-coverage

Install Sui CLI

# macOS (recommended) brew install sui # Other platforms: see official docs # https://docs.sui.io/guides/developer/getting-started/sui-install Verify: sui --version

Quick Reference

# Location of tools (adjust to your skill installation path) SKILL_DIR=<your-workspace>/skills/sui-coverage # Full workflow cd /path/to/move/package sui move test --coverage --trace python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze_source.py -m <module> -o coverage.md

Step 1: Run Coverage Analysis

cd <package_path> sui move test --coverage --trace python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze_source.py -m <module_name> -o coverage.md

Step 2: Read the Coverage Report

Read the generated coverage.md to identify: 🔴 Uncalled functions - Functions never executed 🔴 Uncovered assertions - assert!() failure paths not tested 🔴 Uncovered branches - if/else paths not taken

Step 3: Write Missing Tests

For each uncovered item, write a test: A. Uncalled Function #[test] fun test_<function_name>() { // Setup let mut ctx = tx_context::dummy(); // Call the uncovered function <function_name>(...); // Assert expected behavior } B. Assertion Failure Path (expect_failure) #[test] #[expected_failure(abort_code = <ERROR_CODE>)] fun test_<function>_fails_when_<condition>() { let mut ctx = tx_context::dummy(); // Setup state that triggers the assertion failure <function_call_that_should_fail>(); } C. Branch Coverage (if/else) #[test] fun test_<function>_when_<condition_true>() { ... } #[test] fun test_<function>_when_<condition_false>() { ... }

Step 4: Verify Coverage Improved

sui move test --coverage --trace python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze_source.py -m <module_name>

1. analyze_source.py (Primary Tool)

python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze_source.py --module <name> [options] Options: -m, --module Module name (required) -p, --path Package path (default: .) -o, --output Output file (e.g., coverage.md) --json JSON output --markdown Markdown to stdout

2. analyze.py (LCOV Statistics)

sui move coverage lcov python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze.py lcov.info -f "<package>" -s sources/ Options: -f, --filter Filter by path pattern -s, --source-dir Source directory for context -i, --issues-only Only show files with issues -j, --json JSON output

3. parse_bytecode.py (Low-level)

sui move coverage bytecode --module <name> | python3 $SKILL_DIR/parse_bytecode.py

Testing Assertion Failures

// Source code: public fun withdraw(balance: &mut u64, amount: u64) { assert!(*balance >= amount, EInsufficientBalance); // ← This failure path *balance = *balance - amount; } // Test for the failure path: #[test] #[expected_failure(abort_code = EInsufficientBalance)] fun test_withdraw_insufficient_balance() { let mut balance = 50; withdraw(&mut balance, 100); // Should fail: 50 < 100 }

Testing All Branches

// Source code: public fun classify(value: u64): u8 { if (value == 0) { 0 } else if (value < 100) { 1 } else { 2 } } // Tests for all branches: #[test] fun test_classify_zero() { assert!(classify(0) == 0, 0); } #[test] fun test_classify_small() { assert!(classify(50) == 1, 0); } #[test] fun test_classify_large() { assert!(classify(100) == 2, 0); }

Testing Object Lifecycle

#[test] fun test_full_lifecycle() { let mut ctx = tx_context::dummy(); // Create let obj = create(&mut ctx); assert!(get_value(&obj) == 0, 0); // Modify increment(&mut obj); assert!(get_value(&obj) == 1, 0); // Destroy destroy(obj); }

Error Code Reference

When writing #[expected_failure] tests, use the error constant name: // If the module defines: const EInvalidInput: u64 = 1; const ENotAuthorized: u64 = 2; // Use in test: #[expected_failure(abort_code = EInvalidInput)] fun test_invalid_input() { ... } // Or use the module-qualified name: #[expected_failure(abort_code = my_module::EInvalidInput)] fun test_invalid_input() { ... }

Example: Full Auto-Coverage Session

# 1. Analyze current coverage cd /path/to/my_package sui move test --coverage --trace python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze_source.py -m my_module -o coverage.md # 2. Review what's missing cat coverage.md # Shows: # - decrement() not called # - assert!(value > 0, EValueZero) failure not tested # 3. Add tests to sources/my_module.move or tests/my_module_tests.move # (write the missing tests) # 4. Verify improvement sui move test --coverage --trace python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze_source.py -m my_module # 5. Repeat until 100% coverage

Integration with Agent Workflow

When asked to improve test coverage: Run analysis - Get current coverage state Read source - Understand the module's logic Identify gaps - List uncovered functions/branches/assertions Security review - Analyze for vulnerabilities while writing tests Write tests - Create tests for each gap + security edge cases Report findings - Document any security concerns discovered Verify - Re-run coverage to confirm improvement Always commit test improvements: git add sources/ tests/ git commit -m "Improve test coverage for <module>"

Security Analysis During Testing

Writing tests = Understanding the contract = Finding vulnerabilities When writing tests, actively look for these issues:

1. Access Control

  • Questions to ask:
  • Who can call this function?
  • Should there be owner/admin checks?
  • Can unauthorized users manipulate state?
  • Red flags:
  • Public functions that modify critical state without checks
  • Missing capability/witness patterns

2. Integer Overflow/Underflow

  • Questions to ask:
  • What happens at u64::MAX?
  • What happens when subtracting from 0?
  • Are arithmetic operations checked?
  • Test pattern:
  • #[test]
  • fun test_overflow_boundary() {
  • // Test with max values
  • }

3. State Manipulation

  • Questions to ask:
  • Can state be left in inconsistent state?
  • Are all state changes atomic?
  • Can partial failures corrupt data?
  • Red flags:
  • Multiple state changes without rollback
  • Shared objects without proper locking

4. Economic Exploits

  • Questions to ask:
  • Can someone extract more value than deposited?
  • Are there rounding errors that can be exploited?
  • Flash loan attack vectors?
  • Red flags:
  • Price calculations without slippage protection
  • Unbounded loops over user-controlled data

5. Denial of Service

  • Questions to ask:
  • Can someone block legitimate users?
  • Are there unbounded operations?
  • Can storage be filled maliciously?
  • Red flags:
  • Vectors that grow unbounded
  • Loops over external data

Security Report Template

  • When analyzing a module, generate a security report:
  • ## Security Analysis: <module_name>
  • ### Summary
  • Risk Level: [Low/Medium/High/Critical]
  • Issues Found: X
  • ### Findings
  • #### [SEVERITY] Issue Title
  • **Location:** Line XX
  • **Description:** What the issue is
  • **Impact:** What could happen
  • **Recommendation:** How to fix
  • ### Tested Edge Cases
  • [ ] Overflow at max values
  • [ ] Underflow at zero
  • [ ] Unauthorized access attempts
  • [ ] Empty/null inputs
  • [ ] Reentrancy scenarios

Example: Security-Aware Test

// SECURITY: Testing that non-owner cannot withdraw #[test] #[expected_failure(abort_code = ENotOwner)] fun test_unauthorized_withdraw() { // Setup: Create vault owned by ALICE // Action: BOB tries to withdraw // Expected: Should fail with ENotOwner } // SECURITY: Testing overflow protection #[test] fun test_deposit_overflow_protection() { // Deposit near u64::MAX // Verify no overflow occurs } // SECURITY: Testing economic invariant #[test] fun test_total_supply_invariant() { // After any operations: // sum(all_balances) == total_supply }

Full Workflow with Security

# 1. Coverage analysis sui move test --coverage --trace python3 $SKILL_DIR/analyze_source.py -m <module> -o coverage.md # 2. While writing tests, document security findings # Create SECURITY.md alongside coverage.md # 3. After tests pass, summarize: # - Coverage: X% → 100% # - Security issues found: N # - Recommendations: ...

Related Skills

This skill is part of the Sui development skill suite: SkillDescriptionsui-decompileFetch and read on-chain contract source codesui-moveWrite and deploy Move smart contractssui-coverageAnalyze test coverage with security analysissui-agent-walletBuild and test DApps frontend Workflow: sui-decompile → sui-move → sui-coverage → sui-agent-wallet Study Write Test & Audit Build DApps All skills: https://github.com/EasonC13-agent/sui-skills

Category context

Data access, storage, extraction, analysis, reporting, and insight generation.

Source: Tencent SkillHub

Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.

Package contents

Included in package
4 Scripts1 Docs
  • SKILL.md Primary doc
  • analyze_source.py Scripts
  • analyze.py Scripts
  • parse_bytecode.py Scripts
  • parse_source.py Scripts