Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Combine multiple sources into unified insights with source tracking, conflict resolution, and coverage verification.
Combine multiple sources into unified insights with source tracking, conflict resolution, and coverage verification.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Synthesis fails when sources contradict silently or coverage has gaps. Track everything, resolve conflicts explicitly.
Gather β Map β Extract β Reconcile β Synthesize β Verify
Inventory all sources with metadata: | # | Source | Type | Date | Credibility | Scope | Flag: outdated sources, conflicting authority levels, coverage gaps.
Identify themes across sources. Build overlap matrix: Which sources cover which themes? Where do sources agree/disagree? What's covered by only one source?
Per source, pull: key claims, evidence, unique insights. Tag each extraction with source number. Nothing unattributed.
For conflicts: Note the disagreement explicitly Weight by: recency, authority, evidence quality Choose position OR present both with reasoning Never silently pick one. Conflicts = valuable signal.
Merge extractions into unified narrative: Lead with consensus (N sources agree) Surface tensions (A says X, B says Y because...) Highlight unique insights (only source 3 mentions...)
Coverage check before delivering: All sources represented No theme dropped Conflicts addressed Gaps acknowledged
π SOURCES: [count] ([types breakdown]) π― SYNTHESIS: [unified narrative] β‘ KEY INSIGHTS: [bulleted, with source attribution] β οΈ TENSIONS: [conflicts and resolution reasoning] π³οΈ GAPS: [what wasn't covered, needs more research]
Sources too heterogeneous, scope undefined, or time insufficient for proper reconciliation. References: source-types.md, conflict-resolution.md, coverage-matrix.md
Agent frameworks, memory systems, reasoning layers, and model-native orchestration.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.