Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Score and optimize tweets based on X's real open-source ranking algorithm. Analyzes draft tweets against the actual ranking code — not generic tips. Use when...
Score and optimize tweets based on X's real open-source ranking algorithm. Analyzes draft tweets against the actual ranking code — not generic tips. Use when...
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Score and optimize tweets using rules derived from X's open-source ranking algorithm.
X's "For You" feed is ranked by a Grok-based transformer (Phoenix) that predicts 19 engagement actions for every candidate tweet. The final score is a weighted sum of these predictions. This skill encodes the structural rules from that pipeline into a scoring system. For the full algorithm breakdown, read references/algorithm-rules.md.
When a user asks to score or optimize a tweet draft: Read references/algorithm-rules.md for the complete rules engine Analyze the draft against all rules Output the score card in this format: 🐦 Tweet Composer — Score: XX/100 [Category scores with ✅ ⚠️ ❌ indicators] 📊 Predicted Action Boost: ├─ P(reply): [assessment] ├─ P(favorite): [assessment] ├─ P(share): [assessment] ├─ P(dwell): [assessment] └─ P(not_interested): [assessment] 💡 Suggestions: → [actionable improvements] ✏️ Optimized version: "[rewritten tweet]"
Score 0-100 based on weighted categories: CategoryWeightWhat to checkReply potential25Questions, opinions, CTAs that drive repliesMedia20Native image/video attached (not link previews)Shareability15Would someone DM this or copy the link?Dwell time15Length that makes people stop scrollingContent quality10Clear, original, not genericFormat10No links in body, no hashtags, good lengthNegative signals5Risk of not_interested/mute/block
When composing threads: First tweet = strongest hook (DedupConversationFilter keeps only the best per conversation) 3-6 tweets max (short threads > mega-threads) Each tweet self-contained (many see only the first) Media on tweet 1 or 2 for photo_expand boost CTA in last tweet
Links: Always in reply, never in body (learned penalty from lower engagement) Hashtags: Zero. The model learns they reduce engagement Length: 100-200 chars sweet spot for single tweets Media: Native image/video = separate P(photo_expand) and P(video_quality_view) predictions Video: Must exceed minimum duration threshold for VQV weight to apply Timing: Post when your audience is active — engagement velocity in first 30 min is critical Frequency: AuthorDiversityScorer penalizes exponentially: 2nd post ~55% score, 3rd ~33%. Max 3-4 strong tweets/day Quote tweets: P(quote) has dedicated weight — QTs with added value outperform plain retweets Engagement bait: Questions/polls drive P(reply). "What would you add?" > "Like if you agree"
Agent frameworks, memory systems, reasoning layers, and model-native orchestration.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.