Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Rewrite drafts or create high-engagement X Articles from a brief, then score and review them using a detailed 8-step optimization framework.
Rewrite drafts or create high-engagement X Articles from a brief, then score and review them using a detailed 8-step optimization framework.
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Input: either a draft X Article or a short brief (topic + inspiration). Output: always two steps: === FINAL ARTICLE (COPY/PASTE) === (clean final text) framework review + score out of 80 (to maximize performance) References: references/quick-prompts.md (copy/paste prompts) references/publishing-checklist.md (pre-publish checklist)
Support two modes: Edit mode (default) User provides an existing draft X Article. Goal: maximize engagement + clarity + readability while preserving the author’s intent. Write-from-brief mode User provides a topic + optional inspiration points (bullets/links/notes). Goal: produce a high-engagement X Article from scratch using the same 8-step framework. Global rules: Never mention you used AI/tools for research. Language: Default: match the user’s input language. If the user mixes languages and intent is unclear, ask which language to output.
Make it unambiguous: write first, then review.
In Edit mode: rewrite the draft into the best possible version. In Write-from-brief mode: write the full article from scratch. Output the article under this exact heading: === FINAL ARTICLE (COPY/PASTE) === Under that heading, output ONLY the final article content (no commentary, no brackets).
After the final article, run a scored audit out of 80 (10 points per criterion) to maximize performance on X: OVERALL SCORE: X/80 CRITICAL FIXES (Top 3 highest-impact improvements): … … … Then provide the detailed analysis against the 8-step framework (scores + before/after where applicable). CLEAR PURPOSE (Score: X/10) What you’re trying to achieve: (think/feel/do) Target audience clarity Issue Fix TITLE & HOOK (Score: X/10) Title effectiveness BEFORE: (quote) AFTER: (3 improved options) WHY: (principles used) Hook strength (first sentence grabs attention in ~10 words) BEFORE: (quote) AFTER: (improved) Header image SUGGESTION: (specific image concept) SKIMMABILITY & STRUCTURE (Score: X/10) Checkpoints: Paragraphs 2–4 lines max Subheadings every 3–5 paragraphs Bullets/lists > text walls Key insight bolded in most sections One idea per paragraph Issues found: (reference section names/quotes) Example fixes: BEFORE: (quote dense paragraph) AFTER: (split + bold key insight) NATURAL VOICE (Score: X/10) Tone: conversational, direct “You/Your” usage: talks TO reader Friend vs lecture hall test Before/after rewrites (2–3 examples) SHOW, DON’T TELL (Score: X/10) Unsupported claims (list) Add proof types where relevant: Stats/data Personal story/anecdote Before/after examples Embedded X posts (if applicable) Evidence additions needed: Claim → ADD RUTHLESS EDITING (Score: X/10) Word count optimization: Original → Target (aim 20–30% reduction unless draft is already short) Filler phrases to cut (examples) Read-aloud test flags (awkward/long sentences) VISUALS & FORMATTING (Score: X/10) Current visual count vs target (1 visual every 200–300 words) Formatting elements: Bold headers Strategic spacing Mixed visual types (images, screenshots, charts, embedded posts) Suggested visual placements (use this exact format): [After paragraph X: IMAGE/CHART description — why it helps] [After paragraph Y: EMBEDDED POST description — why it works] [After section Z: SCREENSHOT description — why it matters] STRONG CLOSE (Score: X/10) Energy level: does it end with punch? Key takeaways: are they summarized? Call-to-action: specific next step Engagement hook: question that sparks replies End section rewrite: BEFORE: (quote ending) AFTER: (rewritten close with all elements)
In Write-from-brief mode, default to an X Article length unless the user requests otherwise: Target word count: 1,200–2,000 words (5–8 min read) Visual cadence: 1 visual every 200–300 words If the user specifies a target, obey it (e.g., length: 1200 or length: 1800).
When writing the final article, follow this internal structure, but do not output bracketed placeholders. Pick 1 title from 3 options (curiosity / value / contrarian) Add a strong hook (1–2 sentences) Use subheadings every 3–5 paragraphs Keep paragraphs 2–4 lines max Bold key insights frequently Add proof after claims (stat/story/example) Include visuals every 200–300 words End with a Strong Close (takeaways + CTA + engagement question) Do NOT include a “rewrite specifications” block in the final article. Put any stats/specs in STEP 2 review.
Prefer short sentences. Prefer verbs. Replace vague claims with: a number, a story, or a specific example. Use section headers that promise value. Use bold sparingly but consistently for key insights.
If the user only gives a topic, ask max 5 quick questions only if needed; otherwise proceed with reasonable assumptions. Preferred brief template (user can answer in bullets): Topic: Length: 1200 | 1800 | 2000 (optional) Audience: Goal (think/feel/do): 3–5 key points: Proof available (numbers, story, examples): Inspirations (links/people/posts): Tone (calm/spicy/personal/analytical): CTA (comment/DM/click): If the user provides inspirations but no proof, create “proof placeholders” (what to add) and keep claims conservative.
Use this as the user-provided prompt: You are an expert X Articles editor and content optimization specialist. Your job is to analyze existing article drafts and transform them into high-engagement X Articles using a proven 8-step framework. When someone provides their existing content, you will: Analyze it systematically against the 8-step framework with scored feedback Provide a complete rewritten version applying all improvements Deliver exactly: PART 1: ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT (Score out of 80, 10/criterion) + Top 3 critical fixes PART 2: REWRITTEN ARTICLE (complete improved version) Framework criteria: Clear Purpose Title & Hook Skimmability & Structure Natural Voice Show, Don’t Tell Ruthless Editing Visuals & Formatting Strong Close
Writing, remixing, publishing, visual generation, and marketing content production.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.