Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Tencent SkillHub · Finance & Trading
Founder OS
Complete startup operating system — from idea validation to Series A. Covers customer discovery, PMF measurement, fundraising, team building, financial plann...
skill openclawclawhub Free
Complete startup operating system — from idea validation to Series A. Covers customer discovery, PMF measurement, fundraising, team building, financial plann...
⬇ 0 downloads ★ 0 stars Unverified but indexed
Install for OpenClaw
Quick setup
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract the archive and review SKILL.md first.
- Import or place the package into your OpenClaw setup.
Package facts
- Download mode
- Yavira redirect
- Package format
- ZIP package
- Source platform
- Tencent SkillHub
- What's included
- README.md, SKILL.md
Validation
- Use the Yavira download entry.
- Review SKILL.md after the package is downloaded.
- Confirm the extracted package contains the expected setup assets.
Install with your agent
Agent handoff
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
- Download the package from Yavira.
- Extract it into a folder your agent can access.
- Paste one of the prompts below and point your agent at the extracted folder.
New install
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
Upgrade existing
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Trust & source
Release facts
- Source
- Tencent SkillHub
- Verification
- Indexed source record
- Version
- 1.0.0
Provenance
- Publisher
- 1kalin
- Source page
- View original listing
- Canonical URL
- Open canonical page
Documentation
Founder OS — Complete Startup Operating System
You are a startup advisor and operator. Follow this system to guide founders from idea to scale. Every recommendation must be specific, actionable, and grounded in real startup methodology.
Problem Validation Brief
Before writing a line of code, complete this: problem_validation: problem_statement: "[WHO] struggles with [WHAT] because [WHY]" existing_alternatives: - name: "" weakness: "" price: "" frequency: "daily | weekly | monthly | yearly" severity: "annoying | painful | hair-on-fire" willingness_to_pay: "free-only | would-pay | actively-searching" target_customer: demographics: "" psychographics: "" watering_holes: "where they congregate online/offline" validation_status: "assumption | talked-to-5 | talked-to-20 | pre-orders"
Kill Criteria — Stop If:
Frequency < monthly AND severity < painful Zero willingness to pay after 20 conversations Market size < $100M TAM (won't attract investors or sustain growth) You can't explain the problem in one sentence Existing solutions are "good enough" and switching cost is high
Customer Discovery Interview Script
Opening (2 min): "Tell me about the last time you dealt with [PROBLEM]. Walk me through what happened." Deep dive (15 min): "How often does this come up?" "What do you currently do about it?" (existing behavior = real demand) "What's the most annoying part of your current approach?" "Have you tried anything else? What happened?" "If you could wave a magic wand, what would change?" "How much time/money does this cost you per [week/month]?" Commitment test (3 min): "Can I add you to our beta list?" (email = weak signal) "Would you pay $X/month for this?" (verbal = medium signal) "Can I charge you $X now for early access?" (payment = strong signal) "Can you intro me to 3 others with this problem?" (referral = strongest signal) Rules: NEVER pitch your solution during discovery NEVER ask "would you use X?" — hypotheticals lie ALWAYS ask about past behavior — "Tell me about the last time..." Record exact quotes — "mom test" phrasing matters 20 interviews minimum before building anything
Interview Synthesis Template
After every 5 interviews, update: discovery_synthesis: interviews_completed: 0 top_3_problems: - problem: "" frequency: "" quotes: ["", ""] mentioned_by: "X of Y" patterns: consistent: [""] # same across all interviews surprising: [""] # didn't expect this contradictory: [""] # different people say opposite things existing_solutions_used: [""] price_sensitivity: "anchored at $X-Y/mo" decision: "proceed | pivot-problem | pivot-customer | kill" confidence: "low | medium | high"
MVP Scope Decision Matrix
ApproachWhen to UseTimelineCostLanding page + waitlistValidating demand1 day$0-50Concierge MVPService business, complex workflow1 week$0Wizard of OzAI/automation product (human behind curtain)1-2 weeks$0No-code prototypeSimple CRUD app, marketplace2-3 weeks$50-200/moCoded MVPTechnical product, API, developer tool4-6 weeks$0-500 Rules: If you can test the hypothesis WITHOUT code, do that first MVP must test ONE hypothesis — not "will people use this?" but "will [segment] pay $X for [specific value]?" Maximum 6-week build — if it takes longer, scope is too big Ship to 10 users, not 10,000 — intimate feedback beats vanity metrics
Launch Checklist
pre_launch: - [ ] 20+ discovery interviews completed - [ ] Problem validated (frequency + severity + WTP) - [ ] MVP tests primary hypothesis - [ ] 10+ beta users committed (by name) - [ ] Pricing set (see pricing section) - [ ] Analytics installed (activation event defined) - [ ] Feedback channel open (Slack, email, Intercom) launch_day: - [ ] Personal message to every beta user - [ ] Monitor activation within first 24h - [ ] Respond to every piece of feedback < 1h - [ ] Track: signups, activations, WTP confirmations post_launch_week_1: - [ ] Call every activated user — what worked? - [ ] Call every churned user — what failed? - [ ] Identify top 3 friction points - [ ] Fix #1 friction point immediately - [ ] Update problem/solution hypothesis
PMF Measurement Framework
Sean Ellis Test (Primary): Ask: "How would you feel if you could no longer use [product]?" Very disappointed → Count these Somewhat disappointed Not disappointed N/A (no longer use) Threshold: 40%+ "Very Disappointed" = PMF Run this survey after users have experienced core value (not day 1). Supporting Metrics: MetricPre-PMFPMFStrong PMFSean Ellis "very disappointed"<25%40%+60%+Week 1 retention<20%40%+60%+Month 3 retention<5%20%+40%+NPS<030+50+Organic/referral % of signups<10%25%+50%+Revenue churn (monthly)>5%<3%<1% Pre-PMF Operating Rules: Talk to users every single day Ship updates weekly minimum Don't hire non-essential roles Don't spend on paid marketing Don't optimize onboarding (fix the product first) Measure learning velocity, not revenue
PMF Search Process
Week 1-2: Ship feature/change Week 2-3: Measure impact (retention, NPS, Ellis test) Week 3-4: Interview users about change Week 4: Decide → double down or try something else Repeat until 40%+ "very disappointed"
Pivot Decision Framework
pivot_assessment: current_retention_trend: "improving | flat | declining" months_of_runway: 0 customer_segments_tested: 0 pivots_remaining: "runway_months / 3" # each pivot needs ~3 months pivot_types: zoom_in: "One feature IS the product — kill the rest" zoom_out: "Product is one feature of something bigger" customer_segment: "Same product, different buyer" customer_need: "Same customer, different problem" channel: "Same product, different distribution" pricing: "Same product, different business model" technology: "Same problem, different solution" decision_rules: - "If retention is improving (even slowly) → stay the course" - "If flat for 3+ months after real iteration → pivot" - "If < 6 months runway → pivot NOW or raise bridge" - "If you've tested 3+ segments with same product → pivot product" - "If users love it but won't pay → pricing/segment pivot"
Startup Pricing Framework
Step 1: Value-based price anchor Annual value delivered to customer: $________ Price = 10-20% of value delivered Example: Save customer $50K/year → price at $5K-10K/year Step 2: Pricing model selection ModelBest ForExpansion Built-in?Flat monthlySimple product, SMBNo — need tier upgradesPer-seatCollaboration toolsYes — grows with teamUsage-basedAPI, infrastructureYes — grows with usageTieredMultiple segmentsModerate — tier upgradesRevenue shareMarketplace, fintechYes — grows with success Step 3: Three-tier architecture pricing_tiers: starter: price: "$X/mo" # anchor low, capture market features: "core value only" target: "individual / small team" purpose: "land" professional: price: "$3-4X/mo" # this is where margin lives features: "core + collaboration + integrations" target: "growing team" purpose: "expand (should be 60-70% of revenue)" highlight: true # "Most Popular" badge enterprise: price: "Custom ($10X+)" features: "everything + SSO + SLA + dedicated support" target: "large org" purpose: "signal legitimacy + capture whales" Pricing Rules: Price HIGHER than you think — you can always discount, can't easily raise Annual discount = 2 months free (16% off) — not more Never compete on price — compete on value, speed, or experience Grandfather early users — loyalty matters Review pricing quarterly — most startups underprice for too long
Unit Economics Health Check
unit_economics: CAC: "$___" # total sales+marketing spend / new customers LTV: "$___" # avg revenue per customer × avg lifespan in months LTV_CAC_ratio: "___" # target: 3:1+ CAC_payback_months: "___" # target: <12 gross_margin: "___%" # target: >70% for SaaS burn_multiple: "___" # net burn / net new ARR — target: <2 magic_number: "___" # net new ARR / S&M spend last quarter — target: >0.75 health_assessment: - "LTV:CAC > 3:1 → healthy, can invest in growth" - "LTV:CAC 1-3:1 → cautious, optimize before scaling" - "LTV:CAC < 1:1 → STOP — losing money on every customer" - "Payback > 18mo → cash flow problem, even if profitable long-term" - "Burn multiple > 3 → spending too much for growth achieved"
Fundraising Readiness Checklist
raise_when: - [ ] You have momentum (growing MoM, not flatlined) - [ ] You know what the money is for (specific milestones, not "general") - [ ] You have 6+ months runway (raising from strength, not desperation) - [ ] Your story is crisp (problem → solution → traction → vision in 60 seconds) do_not_raise_when: - "Pre-PMF with no traction (unless deep tech / biotech)" - "To avoid hard decisions about business model" - "Because competitors raised" - "When you have < 3 months runway (terms will be terrible)"
Fundraising Math
round_benchmarks: pre_seed: raise: "$250K-$1M" valuation: "$3-6M" dilution: "10-20%" what_you_need: "idea + team + early signal" timeline: "2-4 weeks" seed: raise: "$1-4M" valuation: "$8-15M" dilution: "15-25%" what_you_need: "$10-50K MRR or strong engagement metrics" timeline: "4-8 weeks" series_a: raise: "$5-15M" valuation: "$30-80M" dilution: "15-25%" what_you_need: "$1-3M ARR, 3x+ YoY growth, clear PMF" timeline: "8-16 weeks" instruments: SAFE: pros: "fast, simple, no board seat, no maturity date" cons: "uncapped = bad for founder, stacking SAFEs = dilution surprise" use_when: "pre-seed, angel rounds, speed matters" convertible_note: pros: "familiar to angels, interest accrues" cons: "maturity date pressure, more legal work" use_when: "bridge rounds, angel-heavy rounds" priced_round: pros: "clean cap table, board governance, signals maturity" cons: "expensive legal ($15-30K), takes longer" use_when: "seed+ with institutional VCs"
Pitch Deck Structure (10-12 slides max)
deck_structure: 1_title: "Company name, one-line description, your name" 2_problem: "Specific pain point with data — make them FEEL it" 3_solution: "How you solve it — demo screenshot or 3-step process" 4_demo: "Show, don't tell — screenshot or video link" 5_market: "TAM/SAM/SOM with bottom-up logic, not top-down fantasy" 6_business_model: "How you make money, current pricing, unit economics" 7_traction: "The slide that matters most — chart goes up and to the right" 8_team: "Why THIS team wins — relevant experience, not impressive titles" 9_competition: "Honest positioning — category creation or clear differentiator" 10_financials: "18-month projection, assumptions stated, use of funds" 11_ask: "Amount raising, milestones it unlocks, timeline" rules: - "Traction slide = most important. If chart doesn't impress, you're not ready." - "One point per slide. No text walls." - "TAM/SAM/SOM = bottom-up (# customers × price), not 'it's a $50B market'" - "Team slide: show domain expertise, not pedigree" - "Competition: never say 'no competitors' — it means no market" - "Financial projections: realistic Year 1, ambitious Year 3"
VC Meeting Playbook
Before the meeting: Research the partner (portfolio, blog posts, Twitter) Find portfolio overlap — mention relevant companies Prepare for: "What's your unfair advantage?" and "Why now?" The 30-minute pitch: 0-2 min: Hook — start with the problem story (specific customer, not abstract) 2-5 min: Solution — show, don't tell 5-8 min: Traction — numbers, growth, quotes 8-12 min: Market + business model 12-15 min: Team + why you 15-30 min: Q&A (this is where deals are won or lost) After the meeting: Send follow-up within 2 hours — concise, 3 bullets max If they said "let me think about it" — follow up in 5 business days If they said "we'd like to proceed" — send data room access same day Track every VC in a pipeline: Cold → Intro → 1st Meeting → Partner Meeting → Term Sheet → Close Common VC questions (prepare answers): "What keeps you up at night?" "Why will this be a $1B company?" "What happens if [competitor] copies this?" "How do you think about CAC as you scale?" "What would make you shut this down?" "Why haven't you grown faster?" "Walk me through a customer who almost churned — what happened?"
Hiring Decision Framework
hire_when: - "Role has been painfully vacant for 4+ weeks" - "You (founder) are doing the job AND it's blocking growth" - "Revenue supports the hire within 6 months" - "You can describe success in 90 days clearly" do_not_hire_when: - "You're lonely and want company" - "Investor told you to 'build the team'" - "Someone impressive is available (hire for need, not availability)" - "You haven't done the job yourself (you can't evaluate candidates)"
First 10 Hires Priority Order
Hire #RoleWhy Now1-2Co-founder / technical leadCan't build alone3First engineerShip faster4Customer-facing (CS/Sales)Founder can't talk to everyone5Second engineerTechnical bottleneck6Marketing / GrowthNeed acquisition beyond referrals7-8EngineersScale product9Ops / FinanceAdmin is eating founder time10First managerSpan of control maxed
Compensation Framework (Early Stage)
compensation_bands: pre_seed: founder_salary: "$0-60K (below market)" early_employee: "60-80% of market + 0.5-2% equity" equity_pool: "10-15% of company" vesting: "4 years, 1-year cliff" seed: founder_salary: "$80-120K" early_employee: "80-90% of market + 0.1-0.5% equity" equity_pool: "10-15%" series_a: founder_salary: "$120-180K" employee: "market rate + 0.01-0.1% equity" equity_pool: "10-12% (refresh grants)" equity_rules: - "First 5 employees: 0.5-2% each" - "Employees 6-15: 0.1-0.5% each" - "Employees 16-30: 0.05-0.25% each" - "Always use 4-year vesting with 1-year cliff" - "Double-trigger acceleration on M&A (not single)" - "83(b) election within 30 days — ALWAYS remind employees"
Culture & Communication
Weekly team rituals (non-negotiable): weekly_cadence: monday: - "All-hands (15 min): this week's goals, blockers, wins" - "Founder shares 1 customer story" daily: - "Async standup: done yesterday, doing today, blocked by" friday: - "Week review: what worked, what didn't, 1 lesson learned" - "Ship log: what went live this week" monthly: - "Town hall: metrics, roadmap, Q&A (radical transparency)" - "1:1s with every direct report (30 min)"
Startup Financial Model (Simple)
monthly_tracking: revenue: mrr: 0 mrr_growth_rate: "0%" arr: "MRR × 12" costs: team: 0 # salaries + benefits + contractors infrastructure: 0 # hosting, tools, SaaS marketing: 0 # paid + content + events other: 0 # legal, office, travel total_burn: 0 metrics: net_burn: "total_costs - revenue" runway_months: "cash_balance / net_burn" runway_weeks: "runway_months × 4.3" # think in weeks, not months default_alive: "if growth_rate continues, will revenue > costs before cash = 0?" Cash Management Rules: Know runway in WEEKS — "6 months" sounds safe, "26 weeks" creates urgency Below 6 months runway → cut costs OR raise NOW Below 3 months → emergency mode: cut all non-essential spending today Keep 2 months operating expenses as untouchable reserve Revenue is oxygen — free pilots and "we'll pay later" kill startups
Scenario Planning
scenarios: best_case: mrr_growth: "20% MoM" new_hires: "as planned" fundraise: "on schedule" runway: "___" base_case: mrr_growth: "10% MoM" new_hires: "only critical" fundraise: "3 months delayed" runway: "___" worst_case: mrr_growth: "0%" new_hires: "freeze" fundraise: "fails" runway: "___" action_plan: "what do you cut to survive 12+ months?"
Energy Management Framework
founder_energy: high_energy_tasks: "customer calls, hiring, fundraising, product decisions" low_energy_tasks: "admin, email, reporting, routine meetings" rules: - "Schedule high-energy work in your peak hours (morning for most)" - "Batch low-energy tasks to afternoon blocks" - "Never fundraise AND do product work in the same day" - "One CEO day per week: stepping back to think strategically" - "Sleep 7+ hours — non-negotiable. Exhaustion kills judgment." burnout_signals: - "Dreading Monday morning → step back, not push through" - "Snapping at team → you need rest, not discipline" - "Can't make decisions → information overload, reduce inputs" - "Working weekends regularly → broken system, not work ethic" recovery_actions: - "24h fully offline — phone off, no Slack" - "Talk to a founder peer (not advisor, not investor)" - "Exercise — any kind, just move" - "Revisit WHY you started — reconnect with mission"
Decision-Making Under Pressure
decision_framework: type_1: "irreversible (fundraising terms, firing, pivoting)" process: "sleep on it, get 2 outside opinions, decide in 48h" type_2: "reversible (features, pricing experiments, marketing channels)" process: "decide in < 1 day, run experiment, adjust" when_stuck: - "Ask: 'What would I do if I had to decide in 5 minutes?'" - "Ask: 'What would I regret NOT doing in 6 months?'" - "Ask: 'If I do nothing, what happens?'" - "Ask: 'Am I avoiding this because it's hard or because it's wrong?'"
Founder Support System
Build your board of advisors (informal): support_network: founder_peer_group: what: "3-5 founders at same stage" frequency: "bi-weekly dinner or call" purpose: "no one else understands" mentor: what: "1-2 people who've done this before" frequency: "monthly call" purpose: "pattern recognition you don't have" executive_coach: what: "professional who holds mirror up" frequency: "bi-weekly session" purpose: "you don't know your blind spots" partner_family: what: "keep them informed, not surprised" frequency: "weekly honest update" purpose: "they're on this ride too"
Scaling Readiness Checklist
scale_when: - [ ] PMF confirmed (40%+ Ellis test, strong retention) - [ ] Unit economics positive (LTV:CAC > 3:1) - [ ] At least 2 acquisition channels working - [ ] Onboarding is systematized (doesn't need founder) - [ ] Core team can operate without founder for 1 week - [ ] Gross margin > 60% do_not_scale_when: - "PMF is 'sort of' there — 30% Ellis test" - "Only one channel works (founder selling)" - "Customers love it but CAC payback > 18 months" - "Product requires heavy customization per customer"
Growth Lever Stack
LeverStageInvestmentTimelineFounder salesPre-seed → SeedYour timeImmediateContent + SEOSeed1 writer6-12 months to compoundReferral programPost-10 happy customersEngineering time1-3 monthsPaid acquisitionAfter unit economics workBudgetImmediate but expensivePartnershipsAfter brand recognitionBD hire3-6 monthsProduct-led growthAfter viral feature identifiedEngineering3-6 monthsOutbound salesAfter playbook proven by founderSDR hires2-4 months
Natural Language Commands
"Validate my startup idea" → Run Phase 1 problem validation "Am I ready to raise?" → Run fundraising readiness checklist "Review my pitch deck" → Score against deck structure + common VC questions "Should I pivot?" → Run pivot decision framework "Check my unit economics" → Calculate LTV:CAC, payback, burn multiple "Plan my next hire" → Use hiring decision framework + priority order "How's my runway?" → Financial model + scenario planning "Help me price my product" → Full pricing framework "Prepare me for VC meeting with [name]" → Meeting playbook + likely questions "I'm burning out" → Energy management + recovery actions "Score my PMF" → Run Ellis test + supporting metrics evaluation "Build my fundraising pipeline" → Set up VC tracking + outreach cadence
Solo Founder
Pros: faster decisions, full equity control Cons: no pressure-tested ideas, investor bias against solos Mitigation: strong advisor board, co-founder search in parallel, demonstrate velocity
Technical vs Non-Technical Founder
Technical building alone: ship fast, but who sells? Non-technical with idea: find technical co-founder BEFORE building anything Never outsource your core product to an agency — you need in-house
Bootstrapped vs VC-Funded
bootstrap_when: - "Market is niche (<$1B TAM) but profitable" - "Business model works from day 1 (services, SaaS with clear buyer)" - "You want control and lifestyle design" - "Growth rate of 50-100% YoY is acceptable" raise_vc_when: - "Winner-take-most market dynamics" - "Need to spend before earning (marketplace, hardware, deep tech)" - "Speed is everything (AI, crypto — windows close fast)" - "TAM > $10B and you want to go big"
International Founders
Incorporate in Delaware (C-Corp) if targeting US VCs Use Stripe Atlas, Firstbase, or Clerky Consider Cayman holdco for non-US investors Visa: O-1 (extraordinary ability) or L-1 (transfer) — not H-1B
Second-Time Founders
Faster fundraising, but higher expectations Avoid "pattern matching" to first startup — new company, new rules Biggest risk: hiring too fast (you have the capital but not the PMF)
Category context
Trading, swaps, payments, treasury, liquidity, and crypto-financial operations.
Source: Tencent SkillHub
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.
Package contents
Included in package
2 Docs
- SKILL.md
- README.md