Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Conducts a comprehensive, weighted assessment of software vendors and partners across financials, technical fit, security, pricing, support, lock-in, and roa...
Conducts a comprehensive, weighted assessment of software vendors and partners across financials, technical fit, security, pricing, support, lock-in, and roa...
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Then review README.md for any prerequisites, environment setup, or post-install checks. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Structured framework for evaluating software vendors, service providers, and technology partners before signing contracts.
Runs a systematic vendor assessment across 8 dimensions: Financial Stability โ Revenue signals, funding, burn rate indicators Technical Fit โ Architecture compatibility, integration complexity, API quality Security & Compliance โ SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, data residency Pricing Analysis โ TCO modeling, hidden costs, contract traps Reference Check โ Customer sentiment, G2/Capterra scores, churn signals Support Quality โ SLA terms, response times, escalation paths Vendor Lock-in Risk โ Data portability, switching costs, proprietary dependencies Roadmap Alignment โ Product direction vs. your needs over 12-36 months
Tell your agent: "Evaluate [vendor] for [use case]" "Compare [vendor A] vs [vendor B] for our [need]" "Run due diligence on [company] before we sign" The agent will research the vendor using web search and produce a scored evaluation report with a GO / CAUTION / NO-GO recommendation.
Each dimension scores 1-10. Overall score is weighted: Technical Fit & Security: 2x weight Pricing & Lock-in: 1.5x weight All others: 1x weight Thresholds: 75+ = GO (proceed with negotiation) 50-74 = CAUTION (address gaps before committing) Below 50 = NO-GO (find alternatives)
When asked to evaluate a vendor: Search the web for: "[vendor] reviews", "[vendor] pricing", "[vendor] SOC2", "[vendor] alternatives", "[vendor] G2 reviews" Check for recent funding/layoff news Look at their API documentation quality Find contract terms and SLA information Score each dimension with evidence Produce the evaluation report Flag any dealbreakers prominently Be direct. Companies hide bad news โ dig for it. A vendor that looks perfect probably isn't. Find the tradeoffs. For comparative evaluations, use the same framework side-by-side with a clear winner per dimension.
Workflow acceleration for inboxes, docs, calendars, planning, and execution loops.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.