Requirements
- Target platform
- OpenClaw
- Install method
- Manual import
- Extraction
- Extract archive
- Prerequisites
- OpenClaw
- Primary doc
- SKILL.md
Assesses wind turbine gearbox health from multi-sensor and inspection data. Classifies damage severity (1-5), identifies root cause, and recommends shutdown...
Assesses wind turbine gearbox health from multi-sensor and inspection data. Classifies damage severity (1-5), identifies root cause, and recommends shutdown...
Hand the extracted package to your coding agent with a concrete install brief instead of figuring it out manually.
I downloaded a skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder and install it by following the included instructions. Tell me what you changed and call out any manual steps you could not complete.
I downloaded an updated skill package from Yavira. Read SKILL.md from the extracted folder, compare it with my current installation, and upgrade it while preserving any custom configuration unless the package docs explicitly say otherwise. Summarize what changed and any follow-up checks I should run.
Evaluates gearbox condition using five input parameters and produces a structured maintenance report.
Load this skill when the user wants to: Assess gearbox health from on-site inspection or sensor data Classify damage severity on a 1-5 scale Determine whether a turbine should be shut down or kept running under monitoring Generate a structured maintenance or escalation plan
Input ParameterWhat to CollectVisual inspectionSurface cracks, pitting, spalling, discoloration, debrisOil iron (Fe ppm)Iron particle concentration in gear oil (ppm)Temperature (C)Bearing/gear temperature, normalized to baselineVibrationRMS or peak-to-peak acceleration (g), frequency anomaliesAcoustic / SoundNoise type: grinding, knocking, whining, clicking
ParameterNormalWarningCriticalOil Fe (ppm)< 100100 - 300> 300Temp above baseline< 5 C5 - 15 C> 15 CVibration RMS (g)< 0.50.5 - 1.5> 1.5AcousticNo anomalyIntermittentContinuousVisualClean surfaceMinor pittingSpalling/crack
Failure ModeTypical IndicatorsMicropittingHigh Fe ppm, slight vibration increase, no visible cracksSpallingHigh Fe ppm, elevated vibration, visible surface damageFatigue crackKnocking sound, vibration spike at gear mesh frequencyBearing wearWhining noise, high temperature, broadband vibration increaseOil contaminationVery high Fe ppm, discolored oil, possible foaming
Collect inputs across all five parameters. If any are unavailable, note as "not measured" and proceed. Evaluate each parameter against the thresholds table. Flag Warning or Critical zones. Cross-correlate symptoms: Fe ppm + vibration increase β wear / spalling progression Knocking sound + vibration spike β fatigue crack Temperature + whining sound β bearing failure Multiple Critical flags β Severity 5 Assign severity: 1 Healthy: All parameters normal. No action required. 2 Early wear: 1-2 parameters in warning zone. Increase monitoring frequency. 3 Moderate damage: 2-3 parameters in warning/critical. Inspect within 2 weeks. 4 Significant damage: Multiple critical flags. Plan shutdown within 48-72 hours. 5 Critical: Imminent failure risk. Immediate shutdown required. Determine root cause from the failure modes table. Generate the output report using the format below.
=== GEARBOX HEALTH REPORT === ROOT CAUSE : [e.g., Progressive spalling on intermediate shaft gear] SEVERITY : [1-5] - [Healthy / Early Wear / Moderate / Significant / Critical] SHUTDOWN : [Yes / No / Conditional] MONITORING STRATEGY: [e.g., Repeat oil sample in 72 hours] [e.g., Daily vibration trend monitoring for 1 week] ESCALATION TRIGGERS: [e.g., Fe ppm exceeds 400 - immediate shutdown] [e.g., Vibration RMS exceeds 2.0 g - immediate shutdown]
Never assign Severity 5 based on one parameter alone. Cross-validate with at least two sources. Temperature readings can be misleading in extreme ambient conditions. Ask for baseline-normalized values. Acoustic descriptions are subjective. Ask for noise type and whether continuous or intermittent. If sensor data is unavailable, rely on visual and oil condition as primary indicators. Do not conflate oil change interval with oil health. New oil can still show high Fe ppm.
After generating the report, confirm with the user: Does the severity match their on-site observations? Are escalation thresholds feasible for their monitoring setup? Are there additional data points (CMS trending, historical Fe ppm) that could refine the assessment?
Agent frameworks, memory systems, reasoning layers, and model-native orchestration.
Largest current source with strong distribution and engagement signals.